跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05514379
NCT05514379Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Disorders of Gait, Postural Stability and Cognition in Parkinson's Disease: Presymptomatic Detection and Targeted Rehabilitation

General University Hospital, Prague2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2022年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change from Baseline instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 12 weeks

研究概览

简要总结

Physiotherapy and targeted rehabilitation are routinely performed in order to influence disorders of posture, gait and stability in Parkinson´s disease (PD), but their effects have been controversial (Keus et al. 2014; Walton wt al. 2014). Recently, several studies suggested that cognitive training can improve gait in patients with PD (Peterson et al. 2016, Heremans et al. 2013), similar to the effects seen in the elderly (Yogev-Seligmann et al. 2008; Amboni et al. 2013). Specific training programs including dual tasking with automatic verbal series, counting etc. have led to increased walking speed and improved stepping cadence, length, and duration in patients with dementia (Schwenk et al. 2010). However, since in advanced PD patients dual-task gait training has to be supervised by therapists, it is not a suitable type of therapy to be performed at home. Therefore, this study aims to verify and extend the encouraging results of the single study which showed a positive effect of cognitive function training on gait in PD (Milman et al. 2014) by exploring this effect in advanced PD patients, by assessing the effect on gait using more targeted clinical and instrumental evaluation, and by comparing two modes of therapy delivery, group and computer-based.

详细描述

  • Background: In a pilot study, Milman et al. 2014 showed that computer-based cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention performed at home might improve selected gait parameters in early patients with Parkinson´s disease (PD).
  • Goal 1: To explore this effect in advanced PD patients
  • Hypothesis 1: Effect of cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention will be detected also in advanced PD patients and this effect will be larger as compared to the results published by Milman et al. 2014.
  • Goal 2: To verify the results published by Milman et al. 2014 using more targeted clinical and instrumental gait assessment, including dual-task gait evaluation as well as instrumental testing of turn fluency (Bertoli et al. 2019).
  • Hypothesis 2: The results published by Milman et al. 2014 will be confirmed and an effect on dual-task gait and turn fluency will be shown.
  • Goal 3: To explore the role of the form of therapy setting, i.e. whether group setting might increase the effect of cognitive training on gait as compared to individual cognitive training at home. Such results have been shown in the case of a physiotherapy intervention by King et al. 2015.
  • Hypothesis 3: The effect of group cognitive training on gait will be larger as compared to individual dose-matched, computer-based cognitive training performed at home. However, it remains to be determined whether the effect size difference between the two groups will outweigh the advantages of tele-rehabilitation.
  • Design: Randomised-controlled trial
  • Interventions: experimental group: group cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention; control group: computer-based cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention performed at home. Intervention in both groups will be dose-matched (experimental: 60 mins, 2x/week, 12 weeks; control: 30 mins, 4x/week, 12 weeks)
  • Follow-up: at 1 and 3 months time points.
  • Power analysis results: at least 38 patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

盲法说明

Participants are blinded to study hypothesis. Investigators are blinded to treatment group.

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • diagnosis of Parkinson´s disease (PD)
  • PD duration ≥8 years
  • mild cognitive impairment
  • stable medication
  • presence of freezing of gait according to the FoG-Q AND/OR Rapid Turns Test

排除标准

  • deep brain stimulation, pump therapy with Duodopa or Apomorphine
  • severe fluctuations with ON state duration for less than 2 hours
  • dopa dysregulation syndrome
  • impulse control disorder
  • untreated depression
  • benzodiazepines except for single dose at night
  • non-compliance
  • inability to walk without support
  • significant co-morbidities likely to affect gait, e.g., acute illness, orthopedic disease, significant visual problems, or a clinical history of stroke
  • involvement in other treatment trials
  • not meeting inclusion criteria

结局指标

主要结局

Change from Baseline instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 12 weeks

时间窗: Baseline and 12 weeks

see Bertoli et al. 2019 for a detailed description; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used

Change from Baseline Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 12 weeks

时间窗: Baseline and 12 weeks

Patient is asked to perform TUG while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used

次要结局

  • Number of steps/day(5 days monitoring at baseline and 12 weeks)
  • The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Color Word Time Score (in seconds) Error score on VST Color Word Task, Total score(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • Change from post-intervention Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 3 months follow-up(12 weeks and 3 months follow-up)
  • Trail Making Test A (TMT A), Total score (in seconds)(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • Change from post-intervention instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 3 months follow-up(12 weeks and 3 months follow-up)
  • Change from post-intervention Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 1 month follow-up(12 weeks and 1 month follow-up)
  • Timed Up and Go Test: single-task performance(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • 10-meter walking test: dual-task performance(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Total score(Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months follow-up)
  • The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Dot Time Score (in seconds) Neutral Word Time Score (in seconds) The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Dot Time Score (in seconds) Neutral Word Time Score (in seconds)(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • Number of falls(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • 10-meter walking test: single-task performance(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • Tower of London, Total score(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21)(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • Falls Efficacy Scale-International(Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up)
  • Change from post-intervention instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 1 month follow-up(12 weeks and 1 month follow-up)

研究者

发起方
General University Hospital, Prague
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Evžen Růžička

Prof. Evzen Ruzicka, MD, DSc.

General University Hospital, Prague

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验