跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07099261
NCT07099261尚未招募不适用

A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate Crowns Designed by Artificial Intelligence Versus a Crowns Designed Traditional Design Software

Tishreen University0 个研究点目标入组 10 人开始时间: 2025年10月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
10
主要终点
Clinical evaluation of proximal contact points

研究概览

简要总结

This clinical research aims to Evaluate Crowns Designed by Artificial Intelligence Versus Crowns Designed by Traditional Design Software

The research will be conducted on a sample of patients with an indication for crowning of the first lower molar. Ten dental crowns will be prepared.

After obtaining written consent from patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 dental crowns will be prepared. Measurements will be taken using silicone impressions and then converted into digital format.

The digital impression will be sent to the selected dental restoration design software used in the study. The same parameters will be adjusted in all software programs for each crown.

After the design is completed, the designs will be sent to the milling unit. For each case, three crowns will be designed and milled from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA).

The crown will be clinically examined and evaluated according to specific criteria. Marginal fit, proximal contact quality, and occlusion will be assessed.

The best crown will be milled from zirconia and delivered to the patient.

详细描述

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized various fields, including dentistry, where AI systems are being promoted to reduce design time for dental restorations. However, it remains unclear whether this increased speed compromises critical factors such as marginal fit accuracy, occlusion, and contact points-elements crucial for the success of dental prosthetics. The existing scientific evidence regarding the efficiency of AI-supported dental design systems is limited. A review of the literature revealed only one clinical study addressing this aspect, highlighting the urgent need for further comparative research.

This clinical research aims to Evaluate Crowns Designed by two Artificial Intelligence computer-aided AIـCAD Versus Crowns Designed by Traditional Design Software One Traditional CAD by assessing the following metrics:

  1. Marginal fit accuracy
  2. Quality of contact points
  3. Occlusion

Importance of the Research

Given the scarcity of studies focusing on AI-based crown design systems clinically, this research will assist dental clinics and laboratories in making informed decisions regarding the adoption of AI technologies versus continuing with traditional methodologies.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged 18-60 years requiring a crown for a lower first molar
  • Good oral and gingival health
  • adjacent teeth in good condition
  • Natural opposing teeth
  • Willingness to participate and sign informed consent

排除标准

  • Abnormal occlusal habits such as bruxism
  • Active periodontal diseases
  • Allergy to crown materials (e.g., polymethyl methacrylate, PMMA)
  • Poor oral hygiene

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical evaluation of proximal contact points

时间窗: immediately after delivering the crown

To evaluate the interproximal contact points of the crown clinically using waxed dental floss: if the floss passes with slight resistance, the contact points are considered acceptable if the floss passes without resistance, the contact points are considered unacceptable if the floss hard to pass or tearing, the contact points are considered Tight Contact

Marginal Fit

时间窗: immediately after delivering the crown

Evaluation is conducted by 2 dentists to determine whether the restoration is clinically acceptable or unacceptable using an explorer or The silicone replica technique (Silicone Replica Technique) is used to evaluate the marginal fit of crowns using silicone material or Evaluation is conducted using Geomagic X

clinical evaluation of the occlusion

时间窗: immediately after delivering the crown

Clinical Evaluation of Occlusion Using Articulating Paper Excellent (both 100- and 12-mm articulating paper imprints exist on the crown and adjacent teeth) nice occlusal contact distribution Good (only 100-mm articulating paper imprints exist on adjacent teeth) Individual occlusal contact points missing or deviated but occlusal contacts on main supporting cusp Satisfactory crown too high, thus supra occlusion No occlusal contacts on supporting cusps but contacts present on other parts of occlusal surface Unsatisfactory No occlusal contact points on crown(infra occlusion)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验