Effect of 2% Lignocaine Medicated Pad (LMP) Administration on Pain Relief and Antibody Response During Rabies Immunoglobulin (RIG) Infiltration: A multicentric randomized controlled trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 600
- 试验地点
- 5
- 主要终点
- Difference in Pain score in the intervention and control arm measured by Visual Analog Scale and Sound Eye Motor Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Rationale The administration ofRabies Immunoglobulin RIG is a painful procedure. Local application of painrelieving medications has been used for many other procedures effectively. Assessing antibody titres helps to see whether a lignocaine medicated pad interferes with immune response. It also provides an opportunity to determine effective immune response and factors affecting it. Novelty No previous studies other than a small clinical trial by our team. Objectives To find the effect 2 percent Lignocaine Medicated Pad LMP on pain relief and antibody response during Rabies Immunoglobulin administration factors determining antibody response, frequency of adverse events following RIG administration and cost effectiveness of procedure. Methods A randomized triple blind controlled trial will be done in three sites in India in tertiary care settings. Patients with Category III animal bite wounds will be randomized to intervention and placebo arms based on a previously generated random number sequence. Sterile gauze pads soaked with 2% lignocaine and normal saline will be intervention and placebo, respectively. Pain relief and antibody response will be the primary outcomes measured. Pain relief will be assessed using a numeric rating scale NRS and sound, eye and motor pain SEM scale. Costeffectiveness will be assessed by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ICER determining the willingness to pay WTP threshold by the contingent valuation method. If the ICER falls below this WTP threshold the intervention will be considered cost-effective. Expected Outcome A cost-effective procedure for pain relief during RIG administration, which can be included in the national policy and guidelines for rabies management.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant, Investigator, Outcome Assessor and Date-entry Operator Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 10.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adult Patients more than 18 years coming to the Preventive Clinic or Antirabies clinic with Category three animal bites in whom Rabies Immunoglobulin Equine Rabies immunoglobulin or Human Rabies Immunoglobulin is advised.
- •Children between 12 and 18 years with Category three animal bites in whom Rabies Immunoglobulin Equine Rabies immunoglobulin Human Rabies Immunoglobulin is advised will also be recruited after completion of six months of data collection and after the first DSMB review.
排除标准
- •The exclusion criteria are those who are not giving consent, known allergy to Lignocaine, history of contact dermatitis, any contraindications to lignocaine and all mucosal exposures.
结局指标
主要结局
Difference in Pain score in the intervention and control arm measured by Visual Analog Scale and Sound Eye Motor Scale
时间窗: Before Rabies Immunoglobulin (RIG) administration | During RIG Administration | After RIG administration
次要结局
- cost-effectiveness(one point after the procedure)
- adverse events(till 42 days)
- factors determining immune response(one point during analysis)
研究者
Zinia Thajudeen Nujum
School of Public Health, Kerala University of Health Sciences
