跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03763383
NCT03763383已完成不适用

Lateral Arm Flap: Usage as Pedicle and Free Flap :A Case Series

Aga Khan University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 21 人开始时间: 2012年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
21
试验地点
1
主要终点
Flap survival/necrosis

研究概览

简要总结

Abstract

Introduction For local reconstruction on upper extremity or as a distant micro vascular flap Lateral arm free flap is an excellent source of tissue with the advantages including short operation time, thin pliable tissue, non-dominant vessel and minimal donor site morbidity, it fulfills the goal of an optimal reconstruction of form, function, and aesthetics .Here the investigator share his experience of lateral arm fasciocutaneous flap, investigator found it effective in covering defects secondary to trauma, malignancy and burns.

Methods A retrospective data analysis was done to analyze our usage of lateral arm flap. This included patient's age, sex, primary problem, area involved, size of the flap and outcome of the flap 3 weeks post operatively. For free flaps this also included the recipient artery used for anastomosis and the number of veins anastomosed.

Results There were 21 flaps done over a period of five years. This included 11 free flaps and 10 pedicle flaps. Average size of free flap was 12x5 cm and that of pedicle flap was 8x5 cm. In the free flap group, there was failure in 2 flaps both of which were due to arterial anastomoses in zone of injury. In the pedicle flap group however, there were no failures.

Conclusion Lateral arm flap is a reliable flap with consistent anatomy that can be used for coverage in different parts of the body.

详细描述

  1. Introduction One aspect of reconstructive surgery is to replace any lost tissue with similar tissue. With advent of microsurgery it is now possible to achieve better aesthetic results with reduced donor site morbidity.

For soft tissue replacement, Radial Forearm Flap had been the procedure of choice since its description in Chinese literature. Problems associated with Radial forearm flap included donor site morbidity and loss of major artery of forearm. This was replaced by anterolateral thigh flap that was described by Song et al in 1984 1 and popularized by Fu Chan Wei. 2 However, its drawback comprises of it being a bulky flap.

Lateral arm free flap was first described by Katsaros et al 3 is a versatile free flap, which can be used in many reconstructions and is now commonly used in upper extremity reconstruction both as a reverse pedicle and as a free flap. It is well suited to cover defects where a thin flap is required especially dorsum of the hand.3, 4, 5 Having advantage of being thinner than the anterolateral thigh flap it also does not sacrifice a major artery and has acceptable donor site morbidity. However, its drawback includes a shorter pedicle and smaller skin paddle. 6

Here investigator share his experience of using the lateral arm flap both as a free flap and as a pedicle flap. 2. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of 21 patients who underwent lateral arm flap reconstruction for various defects in the body from January 2012 to December 2016 was carried out. Patients were grouped into two main categories and were followed for 3 weeks post operatively .Group 1 included patients who had Free Lateral Arm Flap (FLAF), Group 2 included those who had reconstruction using Pedicle Lateral Arm Flap (PLAF). Data was collected using a standard Performa containing details about patient's age, sex, etiology of defect, area involved, size of flap and outcome (survival/failure) of the flap. For free flaps, this also included the recipient vessels used for anastomosis and the number of veins anastomosed. The work has been reported in line with the PROCESS criteria.7

  1. Operative Procedure: Operative procedure was the same as described in literature. 7 The vascular supply of the lateral arm flap is the posterior radial collateral artery (PRCA) which is the branch of the radial collateral artery. The PRCA runs in the lateral intermuscular septum of the arm. A line drawn from the deltoid insertion to the lateral epicondyle denotes the lateral intermuscular septum. (Fig 1 a) Anteriorly, the intermuscular septum is bounded by brachialis and brachioradialis and posteriorly by the triceps. If ELAF extended lateral arm flap is required then a line is drawn from the lateral epicondyle to the radial styloid.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
5 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients who underwent free Lateral Arm Flap
  • Patients who underwent pedicled Lateral arm flap -

排除标准

  • No specific exclusion criteria

结局指标

主要结局

Flap survival/necrosis

时间窗: 3 weeks

was assessed by clinical examination noticing color and bleeding by needle prick

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sami Ullah

Sami Ullah (principal investigator)

Aga Khan University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验