跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04031014
NCT04031014已完成不适用

High Intensity Focused Electromagnetic Field Device for Urinary Incontinence

Boston Urogynecology Associates2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2020年2月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
36
试验地点
2
主要终点
Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I)

研究概览

简要总结

High intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology induces deep pelvic floor muscle contractions designed to deliver the equivalent of 11,200 Kegel exercise over 28 minutes, with the intention of increasing neuromuscular tone of the pelvic floor. This study will have looking at treatment of the two of the most common pelvic floor disorders: stress or stress predominant urinary incontinence and urge or urge predominant urinary incontinence.

详细描述

Pelvic floor dysfunction is common and can include symptoms of urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence and prolapse. Studies suggest that pelvic floor dysfunction may affect up to 25% of women in the United States including 17.1% of women with moderate to severe urinary. While most causes of stress/stress predominant urinary incontinence and urge/urge predominant urinary incontinence are due to of poor pelvic floor musculature and abnormal neuromuscular control, the cause of these abnormalities is not known. Traumatic injuries to the pelvic area, such as in an accident, and complications from vaginal childbirth can contribute to this condition. Some cases are due to a learned behavior (repeated actions of straining).

For most pelvic floor disorders, first line therapy involves behavioral modifications and pelvic floor physical therapy. Physical therapy has proven benefits for treatment of pelvic floor disorders and may improve symptoms in up to 70% of patients with any urinary incontinence (either OAB or SUI), and 60-70% patients with FI. Unfortunately, not all patients are able or willing to undergo treatment with pelvic floor physical therapy. During therapy, patients are undressed, and the therapist works internally palpating the muscles in the vagina and rectum to facilitate rehabilitation. Treatment with the BTL EMSELLA allows for similar rehabilitation of the pelvic floor while patients remain comfortably clothed.

The use of magnetic stimulation to treat pelvic floor disorders has been studied previously. In one prospective cohort study of 91 women, treatment with weekly sessions of perineal magnetic stimulation was associated with improved quality of life and decreased urinary leakage episodes. Magnetic stimulation has also been shown to improve urodynamic parameters, both increasing the maximum urethral pressure for patients with stress incontinence, and increase bladder capacity for those with urgency incontinence. The BTL EMSELLA is a device cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for entirely non-invasive electromagnetic stimulation of pelvic floor musculature for the purpose of rehabilitation of weak pelvic muscles and restoration of neuromuscular control for the treatment of male and female urinary incontinence. High intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology induces deep pelvic floor muscle contractions designed to deliver the equivalent of 11,200 Kegel exercise over 28 minutes, with the intention of increasing neuromuscular tone of the pelvic floor. This study will look at treatment of the two of the most common pelvic floor disorders: stress or stress predominant urinary incontinence and urge or urge predominant urinary incontinence.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

盲法说明

Two blinded protocols are available on the device, neither investigators, participants or care providers will know the active treatment arm

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Subject provides written informed consent and HIPAA authorization before any study procedures are conducted
  • Age greater than 18
  • Subject has a body mass index (BMI) < 37 kg/m2
  • Subject has stress urinary incontinence, urge incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence as determined by the QUID;
  • Subject is willing to continue level of core exercise currently being performed or not performed during the study (e.g. gym, Pilates, yoga);
  • Subject is willing to maintain her current prescription and over the counter medications throughout the study without changing them;
  • Subject agrees to comply with the study procedures and visits.

排除标准

  • Subject has used the BTL EMSELLA device previously;
  • Subject has any significant pelvic organ prolapse; stage III or greater
  • Subject is unwilling to maintain current level of exercise throughout the study;
  • Subject planning to have surgery during the study;
  • Subject has untreated malignancy;
  • Subject is pregnant, planning to get pregnant or within 3 months postpartum;
  • Subject has a pacemaker;
  • Subject has and implant or IUD containing metal;
  • Subject has piercing between the waist and knees and is not willing to remove it before each treatment;
  • Subject is using a pessary or other anti-incontinence device
  • Subject has implanted defibrillator, implanted neurostimulator
  • Subject has metal implants
  • Subject has a drug pump

结局指标

主要结局

Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I)

时间窗: Baseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 3 months after treatment

The PGI comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of psychopathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) has been validated for use in female patients with urinary incontinence and prolapse. Using this measure we hope to assess for overall improvement in symptoms after treatment. Change from baseline will range from -6 to +6 with higher scores representing better outcomes.

次要结局

  • 24 hour voiding diary(Baseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 3 months after treatment)
  • FSFI(Baseline, 2 weeks after treatment, 3 months after treatment)

研究者

发起方
Boston Urogynecology Associates
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

William D. Winkelman

Division Director

Boston Urogynecology Associates

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验