跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06076239
NCT06076239已完成不适用

Effect of ESWT Applied on the Trigger Point on Pain Function and Effusion in Individuals With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Istanbul Arel University2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2022年3月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
32
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pain intensity

研究概览

简要总结

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ESWT applied to trigger points on pain, function, and effusion in individuals diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Material and methods: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial with a total of 32 which were randomly divided into two equal groups (ESWT Group (EG), n = 16; Control Group (CG), n=16). The participants in the EG were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatment while CG received only conventional treatments for five days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was pain intensity Visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary measurements were Tendon thickness and effusion with Ultrasound, Range of motion (ROM), Manual muscle testing (MMT), Corbin posture analysis, Constant Murley Score (CMS), Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH). Supraspinatus tendon thickness and effusion of the cases included in the study were evaluated by ultrasonography before and after the treatment(3 weeks) by the same specialist physician who was blind to the groups. Normal joint range of motion by universal goniometer, muscle strength by manual muscle test, posture evaluation by Corbin posture analysis, pain evaluation by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional evaluation by Constant Murley Score (CMS), Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH) by physiotherapist It was evaluated before and after the treatment (3 weeks).

详细描述

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ESWT applied to trigger points on pain, function, and effusion in individuals diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome.

This was a randomized controlled clinical trial with a total of 32 which were randomly divided into two equal groups (ESWT Group (EG), n = 16; Control Group (CG), n=16). The participants in the EG were given Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) in addition to conventional treatments , while CG received only conventional treatment for five days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. Conventional treatment consist of Ultrasound treatment (Gymna Pulson200) (1 mHz. treatment dose average 1.5 w/cm², intermittent with a small head (50%), 5 minutes ) around the glenohumeral joint of the cases in both groups participating in the study; at an intensity that the patient can tolerate, covering the painful area TENS (modified biphasic asymmetric pulse, and it was set to a pulse width of 100 μs and a frequency of 100 Hz, 20 min,) (Hometech ht 66b) applied; hotpack and exercises (posterior capsule stretching, wand exercises, mobilization approximately 60 minutes of conventional treatment consisting of exercises and shoulder isometric exercises) was applied once a day, 5 times a week in both groups. In addition to conventional physiotherapy. additional to conventional treatment EG was applied 1000 pulses to the trigger point of the patients with a trigger point in one of the supraspinatus, subscapularis and infraspinatus muscles, 500 pulses to the surrounding area, 2 bars, ESWT (GYMNMA Shockmaster 500) was applied for a total of 5 sessions in 3 weeks (2 sessions in the first week, 2 sessions in the second week, 1 session in the third week) at 10 Hz, medium energy level (<0.28 mJ/mm2).Supraspinatus tendon thickness and effusion of the cases included in the study were evaluated by ultrasonography before and after the treatment(3 weeks) by the same specialist physician who was blind to the groups. Normal joint range of motion by universal goniometer, muscle strength by manual muscle test, posture evaluation by Corbin posture analysis, pain evaluation by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional evaluation by Constant Murley Score (CMS), Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH) by physiotherapist It was evaluated before and after the treatment (3 weeks).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Supraspinatus tendon thickness and effusion of the cases included in the study were evaluated by ultrasonography before and after the study by the same specialist physician who was blind to the groups.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Having an active trigger point in the infraspinatus, supraspinatus, subscapularis muscles.
  • Positive impingement tests such as Hawkings, Neer and Jobe test, 60°-120° painful arc of motion are positive.
  • who were diagnosed with impingement syndrome by ultrasonography (USG) and clinical examination.

排除标准

  • patients with severe dementia or psychiatric disease,
  • diabetic patients with sensory problems,
  • and a history of malignancy.

结局指标

主要结局

Pain intensity

时间窗: 3 week

The Visual Analog Scale that is highly feasible for clinical research and practice to assess pain intensity was scored by means of a 10-cm long horizontal line ranging from (0 cm = no pain) at one end to (10 cm = maximum imaginable pain) at the other on which participants marked a point according to their subjective perception of pain

次要结局

  • Thickness of supraspinatus tendon(3 week)
  • Shoulder ROM (flexion,extension,abduction,adduction,internal rotation,external rotation)(3 week)
  • DASH(3 week)
  • Effusion in shoulder(3 week)
  • Corbin posture analyze(3 week)
  • Shoulder muscle strength(3 week)
  • Constant Murley Score(3 week)

研究者

发起方
Istanbul Arel University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Seçil ÖZKURT

Asst. Prof. Dr.

Istanbul Arel University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验