JPRN-UMIN000001497未知2 期
Midazolam v.s. propofol for sedaion in endoscopic submucosal dissection; a randomized phase II trial. KDOG0801 - Sedation in endoscopic submucosal dissection
Kitasato Digestive disease and Oncology Group0 个研究点目标入组 138 人开始时间: 2008年11月11日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 138
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20years-old 至 ot applicable（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •ASA classification:above III. severe disease in heart, lung, liver, or kidney. allergic episode with midazolam or propofol. women in pregnancy or breast-feeding any other reasosn by which docter judged inappropriate case.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
2 期
Propofol vs. Midazolam With Propofol for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients With Previous Paradoxical Reaction to MidazolamSedationEndoscopyNCT04072328DongGuk University30
已完成
不适用
SCH-01-2014FinishedJPRN-UMIN000025385Soonchunhyang University100
已完成
不适用
Propofol versus Midazolam for Procedural Sedation of Anterior Shoulder DislocatioDislocation of shoulder joint.Contusion of shoulder and upper armIRCT201501236238N2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences48
已完成
不适用
Evaluation of sedation with propofol versus midazolam for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in patients with liver cirrhosis: Randomized controlled trial.Esophageal varixJPRN-UMIN000017173Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital20
进行中（未招募）
1 期
Sedation With Propofol or Midazolam/Fentanyl by endoscopy nurses for endoscopic examination of the lungs.A clinical randomized trial on safety and satisfactioSatisfaction and safety of propofol sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in patients undergoing endoscopic pulmonary investigation.MedDRA version: 17.1Level: LLTClassification code 10049683Term: Monitored anesthesia care sedationSystem Organ Class: 100000004865EUCTR2013-004358-12-DKGentofte Hospital, Dep. of Medicine