Testing Radon Com Methods: Clinical Trial Smartphone App vs Print Brochures
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 130
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Ordering a free radon test kit
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of radon information delivered via the radon app vs. a traditional approach (printed brochure). The prevalence of exceptionally high levels of residential radon in ND, coupled with public's poor understanding of this hazard, is a critical public health problem.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •The principal eligibility criterion is that participants own a smartphone.
排除标准
- •The principal exclusion criterion is previous testing for radon within the past two years.
研究组 & 干预措施
Print brochures
Participants assigned to the print brochure group will receive three educational print brochures about radon published by EPA via postal mails for three months (one per each month).
干预措施: Print brochure (Other)
The radon app
Participants assigned to the radon app group will be asked to use the radon app for three months where they will be exposed to mobile friendly educational content that is repurposed from educational print brochures about radon published by EPA.
干预措施: The radon app (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Ordering a free radon test kit
时间窗: Through the study completion - 3 months
The rate at which participants order a free radon test kit
Using the radon test kit
时间窗: Through the study completion - 3 months
The rate at which participants use the radon test kit to test their houses
Change from baseline radon knowledge at 3 months
时间窗: Change from baseline knowledge level to the completion of study at 3 months
Participants' knowledge about radon and its dangers, how to protect themselves from radon, etc.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Soojung Kim
Associate Professor
University of North Dakota