A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial of a Mindfulness Booster Course Following an 8-week Staff Mindfulness Programme
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Mindfulness booster course acceptability
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness booster course for UK healthcare staff who have previously participated in an eight-week mindfulness course. The measures of feasibility and acceptability that will be examined include: 1. the ease with which participants are recruited to the clinical trial; 2. the extent to which participants choose to remain in the mindfulness booster course; 3. the extent to which participants choose to remain in the clinical trial; 4. how acceptable the participants find the mindfulness booster course; 5. the level of outcome measure completion; 6. whether there is a preliminary indication that the course may reduce stress. Participants will be randomly allocated to either a mindfulness booster course or a control group, who will be encouraged to continue taking care of their wellbeing as they normally would. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires at three time-points.
详细描述
This pilot randomised controlled trial seeks to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness booster course for UK National Health Service staff who have previously completed an 8-week mindfulness-based intervention. Participants will be randomised to either the 8-week mindfulness booster course or a control group, in which participants will be encouraged to continue taking care of their wellbeing as they normally would. A battery of self-report measures will be administered online at baseline (weeks 0-1), mid-intervention (week 7), and post-intervention (weeks 11-12). The indices of feasibility and acceptability that will be examined include: 1. ease of recruitment; 2. participant retention in the intervention; 3. participant retention in the study; 4. acceptability of the intervention; 5. outcome measure completion; 6. whether there is a preliminary signal of efficacy on the primary outcome measure (stress). These indices will be compared to progression criteria (which are detailed in the outcome measures section) to determine whether the intervention is sufficiently feasible and acceptable to progress to a full-scale RCT in future research.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
Assessment of outcome will be by self-report measures administered by an online survey. Therefore, assessment of outcome will be masked from the researchers, but not the participants themselves.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •UK National Health Service staff member from the South-East, South-West and/or London, including, but not limited to, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust;
- •have completed an 8-week staff mindfulness course within the past three-years (individuals will be considered to have "completed" a mindfulness course if they attended four or more sessions (Simpson et al., 2017; Verweij et al., 2018)).
排除标准
- •currently on sick leave;
- •planning on undertaking another 8-week mindfulness course;
- •have previously found practicing mindfulness distressing.
结局指标
主要结局
Mindfulness booster course acceptability
时间窗: Weeks 11 to 12
Response to Likert type questions and content analysis of qualitative data will be compared against the following progression criterion to assess retention in the study: Green: the majority of intervention participants report the intervention is acceptable as it is or with minor adjustments; Amber: there are inconsistent reports of acceptability or the intervention requires bigger adjustments; Red: the majority of intervention participants report the intervention is unacceptable or requires adjustments which cannot be completed
Number of participants recruited
时间窗: 10 months following the start of recruitment
The number of participants recruited over 10-months will be compared against the following progression criterion to assess the feasibility of recruitment: Green: 40-50; Amber 24-39; Red: \<24.
Proportion of intervention group participants who attend at least half of the mindfulness booster course intervention sessions
时间窗: Weeks 0 to 12
The proportion of participants who attend at least half of the intervention sessions will be compared against the following progression criterion to assess retention in the intervention: Green: ≥50%; Amber 25-49%; Red: \<25%.
Estimate of between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on the primary outcome measure of change in Perceived Stress Scale scores from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).
时间窗: Weeks 11-12
The estimated between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on the primary outcome measure of change in Perceived Stress Scale scores from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12) will be compared against the following progression criterion to provide a preliminary indicator of effectiveness: Green: effect size in favour of intervention arm and 95% confidence interval for that effect size contains (or is greater than) the minimal clinically important difference found by Drachev et al. (2020). Amber: effect size is in favour of control, but the minimum clinically important difference is included in the 95% confidence interval; Red: effect size is in favour of control, and the minimum clinically important difference is not included in the 95% confidence interval.
Proportion of study participants who remain in the study
时间窗: Weeks 0 to 12
The proportion of study participants who remain in the study will be compared against the following progression criterion to assess retention in the study: Green: ≥50%; Amber 25-49%; Red: \<25%.
Completion rate of the outcome measures
时间窗: Weeks 0 to 12
The rate of the outcome measures completion will be compared against the following progression criterion to assess the feasibility of outcome measurement: Green: ≥60%; Amber 40-59%; Red: \<40%.
次要结局
- Estimate of the between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on change in the Brief Sussex Oxford Compassion to Self Scale (SOCS-S) from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).(Weeks 11-12)
- Estimate of the between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on change in the 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).(Weeks 11-12)
- Estimate of the between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on change in the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).(Weeks 11-12)
- Estimate of the between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on change in the 15-item Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15) from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).(Weeks 11-12)
- Estimate of the between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on change in the Brief Compassion for Others Scale (SOCS-O) from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).(Weeks 11-12)
- Estimate of the between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on change in the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWS) from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).(Weeks 11-12)
- Estimate of the between group effect size of the mindfulness booster intervention compared to control on change in the Sussex Burnout Scale (SBS) from baseline (weeks 0-1) to post-intervention (weeks 11-12).(Weeks 11-12)