Intradermal Purse-String Closure Vs Second Intention Healing
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Assessment of Scar on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale
研究概览
简要总结
To compare healing time, scar size, aesthetic outcome, and complication rates following second intention healing or purse string closure of surgical wounds on the trunk or extremities. This study, will allow surgeons to make informed decisions on whether purse string closure is superior to that of second intention healing and thus worth considering or inferior and not worth performing.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Over 18 years of age
- •Able to give informed consent themselves
- •Willing to return for follow-up visits
- •Post-operative defects greater than 8 mm (in greatest diameter or length of circular or oval geometric shape) on the trunk and extremities (including the shin, hands, and feet)
排除标准
- •Mentally handicapped
- •Unable to understand written and oral English
- •Incarceration
- •Under 18 years of age
- •Unwilling to return for follow-up
- •Pregnant women
- •Wounds less than 8 mm in length
- •Wounds on the head, neck or digits
- •Patients in which primary linear closure is recommended
结局指标
主要结局
Assessment of Scar on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale
时间窗: 3 months
After surgical procedure, subjects will be randomized into one of two wound healing groups: by second intention (no sutures) or by purse-string closure (with sutures). After 3 months, subjects will return to clinic for evaluation of the pain scale and cosmesis of both types of healing techniques.
次要结局
未报告次要终点