Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 114
- 试验地点
- 6
- 主要终点
- Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to determine whether transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation (TENS SNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a more effective therapeutic option for subjects with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) who have failed conventional therapy. Our primary hypothesis is that TENS therapy is a more effective treatment option due to ease of use and improved subject compliance with this form of therapy.
详细描述
To compare the long-term efficacy, subject compliance, and subject satisfaction of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) therapy versus transcutaneous electrical sacral nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic overactive bladder. Previous short-term studies suggest that these therapies have equal efficacy in improving OAB symptoms, but we hypothesize that long-term efficacy and success is actually higher in the TENS group due to ease of use, since subjects can self-administer this therapy. Secondary goals are to evaluate subject quality of life improvement scores, bladder diary scores (change in the frequency of urination), and changes in urodynamic studies while undergoing these therapies.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age >18 years
- •Predominant complaint urge urinary incontinence (3 or more episodes per week) OR overactive bladder (8 or more voids per day, and/or 2 or more voids per night)
- •Failed trial of conservative therapy (bladder training, fluid modification, diet modification, caffeine restriction, pelvic floor training)
- •Failed trial of anticholinergic either due to inability to take the medication, adverse reaction to medication, or no improvement on medication
- •Willing and mentally competent to participate in study
- •Willing to complete study questionnaires
- •No contraindications to undergoing PTNS or TENS therapy
排除标准
- •Age < 18 years
- •Presence of urinary fistula
- •Male. (Males will be excluded because of the different etiology of overactive bladder for males which is primarily caused by prostate problems for men versus the primarily idiopathic cause in women).
- •Recurrent or current urinary tract infection (5 or more infections in the last 12 months)
- •Bladder stones
- •Bladder cancer or suspected bladder cancer
- •Hematuria
- •Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study (urine pregnancy test will be administered to those who are premenopausal and who have not had a hysterectomy)
- •Central or peripheral neurologic disorders such as Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spina bifida, or other spinal cord lesion
- •Metal implants such as pacemaker, implantable defibrillator, or metal implants where PTNS or TENS device needs to be placed (sacrum or ankle/leg).
- •Uncontrolled diabetes
- •Diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
- •On anticoagulants
- •Current use of anticholinergics or use within the last 4 weeks
- •Current use of botox bladder injections or bladder botox injection within the last year
- •Current use of interstim therapy or currently implanted interstim device or leads
- •Bladder outlet obstruction
- •Urinary retention or gastric retention
- •Painful Bladder Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis
结局指标
主要结局
Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial
时间窗: 2 years
The primary response variable is 'success' at 1 year, defined as a 50% or more reduction in the total number of incontinence episodes, or a 25% or more reduction in number of daily or nightly voids AND that the patient continues to use the therapy at one year. Therefore primary response is: 50% reduction in incontinence, OR 25% reduction in nightly voids AND continued use of therapy at one year.
次要结局
- Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial(2 Years)
研究者
Shannon Lamb
Physician
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center