COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY BLOCKBUSTER VERSUS INTUBATING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR INTUBATION
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Time taken for successful tracheal intubation by Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway
研究概览
简要总结
A newer device similar to ILMA was recently designed in 2012 with the name Blockbuster Laryngeal mask airway by Professor Ming Tian .
The efficacy and success of the new airway device have not been studied much and comparison with other devices of the airway management is limited. Due to its ease of use, speed of implantation, and success rate, the aim is to compare Blockbuster LMA and ILMA methods in patients undergoing elective surgery during general anaesthesia to evaluate whether it is an acceptable alternative for airway management.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant and Investigator Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA 1 & 2) patients.
排除标准
- •Patients with cardiovascular diseases
- •Risk of aspiration pneumonitis e.g, pregnant patients, history of gastro-oesophageal reflux
- •Obesity (Body Mass Index > 30kg/metre square.
结局指标
主要结局
Time taken for successful tracheal intubation by Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway
时间窗: Time taken after achieving adequate ventilation by both airway devices to time taken to achieve successful tracheal intubation by both Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway.
次要结局
- 1.Time taken for successful insertion of airway device(2.Number of attempts for successful insertion)