I Want to Talk About Climate Change, But I Wish I Didn't Have to… A Descriptive Qualitative Study of an Intervention Combining Creative Arts and Philosophical Inquiry to Help Elementary School Students Cope With Climate Change Emotions
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 15
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Social validity of the intervention
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this study was to qualitatively document the social validity of an intervention combining creative arts and philosophy inquiry and to examine its acceptability, the perceived goals, and perceived benefits for children's mental health and ability to cope with climate change from the perspective of one elemetary-school class students and their teacher.
The guiding research question was: How do children and their teacher perceive the acceptability, the goals and the benefits of the intervention? The participants were asked to participate in a seven-week creative arts and philosophical inquiry intervention. Once a week, a research assistant led a workshop using creative arts and group philosophical inquiry to discuss the topic of climate change and the emotions that can arise. Students participated in a brief individual interview after the intervention. The teacher also participated in an individual online interview.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 8 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Elementary school students between the ages of 8 and 12 years old who's teacher accepted to participate in the study
- •Elementary school teacher
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Creative arts an philosophy inquiry intervention
Participation in a seven-week school-based creative arts and philosophy inquiry intervention to talk about climate change emotions
干预措施: Making room for climate emotions in the classroom (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Social validity of the intervention
时间窗: Immediately after the end of the intervention (at week 7)
The social validity comprises of the perceived acceptability, goals and benefits of the intervention from participants' perspectives. It was measured using semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions to allow children and teachers to freely describe in detail their experience of the intervention. The interview guide was developed by the research team and piloted in previous research project to ensure that children understood the questions and that it allowed both positive and negative elements related to the intervention to emerge.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Terra Léger-Goodes
Principal investigator
Université du Québec a Montréal
