Is Better the One Type of Manual Therapy Than Others for to Treat the Patients With Chronic Neck Pain? : A Randomized Clinical Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 61
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Visual Analogue Scale
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative effectiveness of high velocity and low amplitude (HVLA)vs Mobilization (Mob) vs Mobilization with movement technique (MWMT) in sample of patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). Secondly to evaluate the immediate effects in range of motion and pain thresholds, and the interaction between psychological factors and the outcomes of these three types of manual therapy.
The hypothesis is that all manual therapies techniques will produce similar effects.
详细描述
The randomized controlled trial included patients with mechanically reproducible CNP, ≥ age 18-years who are randomized into three groups of treatment. The main outcome measures were the Visual Analogue scale (VAS), and, with secondary measures of Neck Disability Index (NDI), Global Rating Of Change (GROC), Cervical Range Of Motion (CROM), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T), Beck depression Inventory (BDI-II), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Clinical Diagnosis of Chronic neck pain
排除标准
- •Neck pain is associated with whiplash injuries.
- •Resting blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg.
- •Cervical radiculopathy.
- •Cervical disc herniation.
- •Fibromyalgia syndrome.
- •Previous neck surgery.
结局指标
主要结局
Visual Analogue Scale
时间窗: The Patients will be followed for 12 weeks after treatment
visual analogue scale (VAS). Despite being a subjective evaluation, it has been documented in previous studies its reliability and validity and its sensitivity to the clinical changes. For this reason, this scale has been used in numerous clinical trials on neck pains to evaluate the results. The patient places a vertical mark on a flat horizontal line of 10 cm. One extreme is 0 (no pain) and the other extreme is 10 (maximum pain) and it must be a difference of 2 points in the evaluation range to produce minimal improvement which is clinically significant.
次要结局
- Neck disability(The Patients will be followed for 12 weeks after treatment)
- Active Cervical Range of Motion(The Patients will be followed for 12 weeks after treatment)
- Pressure Pain thresholds (PPTs)(pre-treatment and post-treatment)
研究者
Josue Fernandez Carnero
PhD and Physical Therapist
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos