跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05982366
NCT05982366已完成不适用

distAl vs. coNventional Transradial Access for coRonary procEdures Study (ANTARES)

Łukasz Koziński2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 400 人开始时间: 2022年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
400
试验地点
2
主要终点
The primary composite endpoint consisted of rate of access crossover, rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and rate of access-related vascular complications.

研究概览

简要总结

The distal transradial approach (dTRA) via the anatomical snuffbox is hypothesized to be more beneficial than the conventional transradial access (cTRA) in patients undergoing coronary procedures. This prospective single-center randomized trial was designed to investigate the safety, efficacy, and various ultrasound parameters of dTRA.

详细描述

Transradial approach (TRA) has emerged in most countries as a default strategy in urgent and elective coronary procedures. The advantages of TRA compared to the transfemoral access encompass a reduction of mortality, complications, and cost as well as improvement of patient's comfort. The aim of the present study (ANTARES, distAl vs coNventional Transradial Access for coRonary procEdures Study) was to assess the feasibility, safety and various ultrasound parameters of dTRA in the anatomical snuffbox as the first-line strategy, in comparison with cTRA, in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study is a non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. There are two arms: distal transradial access and conventional transradial approach.

400 patients were enrolled.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients referred for CAG and/or PCI

排除标准

  • ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • sudden cardiac arrest
  • hemody-namic instability
  • chronic kidney disease (stages 4-5)
  • forearm artery occlusion
  • previous unsuccessful ipsilateral TRA
  • unfavorable RA diameter
  • ultrasound unavailability

结局指标

主要结局

The primary composite endpoint consisted of rate of access crossover, rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and rate of access-related vascular complications.

时间窗: up to 24 hours

Access crossover from unsuccessful random arterial access (if the initial access point fails) to another one. Access-related complications after the procedure measured with Doppler Ultrasound (included radial artery occlusion, significant hematoma (EASY classification grade III-V), arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, perforation and spasm). MACE definied as myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent revascularization, all-cause death.

次要结局

  • efficacy endpoint: duration of access performance(during the procedure index)
  • efficacy endpoint: rate of access crossover(during the procedure index)
  • safety endpoint: access-site vascular complications(after 24 hours post procedure)
  • safety endpoint: patients' discomfort evaluated during access performance(during the procedure)

研究者

发起方
Łukasz Koziński
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Łukasz Koziński

Principal Investigator Łukasz Koziński, Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska Lekarz Łukasz Koziński

Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska Lekarz Łukasz Koziński

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Feasibility and Safety of the Routine Distal... | 临床试验