跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06240377
NCT06240377撤回不适用

Study of the Effectiveness of Percutaneous Neuromodulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Pharmacological Treatment in Cancer Patients With Lower Limb Pain

Universidad Europea de Canarias1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2024年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
OKS (Oxford Knee Score)

研究概览

简要总结

the goal of this clinical trial is to compare in cancer patients:

Is ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation useful for lower limb pain relief in cancer patients?

Is direct current transcranial stimulation useful for relieving lower limb pain in cancer patients?

Participants will recive treatments of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation and DC Transcranial Stimulation

Researchers will compare ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation and DC Transcranial Stimulation to see if pain in the lower extremities is reduced

详细描述

Increasing life expectancy, aging populations, and unhealthy lifestyles increase the likelihood of cancer. Lower limb pain is one of the most common symptoms causing functional incapacitation that makes it necessary to seek and improve its assessment tools, prevention and treatment.

Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation is a technique that is being applied clinically by physical therapists. It is an accessible, minimally invasive, safe and economical procedure to apply.

Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has been widely studied for the treatment of chronic pain. It is an accessible, non-invasive, safe and cost-effective procedure to apply.

Traditional therapies have been, are and will continue to be useful tools to consider. The reduction in the manufacturing costs of assessment and treatment tools in recent years makes it affordable to obtain these equipment as intervention tools, since its usefulness in improving functionality and reducing pain is proven.

Opioid analgesics are the main tool for the treatment of pain in cancer patients, but adverse effects or inadequate treatment make necessary the search for other therapeutic tools more economical, rapid and with less risk of addiction and / or side effects.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Simple Blind, Evaluator

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The proposed inclusion criteria for the study are as follows:
  • Age between 18 and
  • Pain in lower limbs
  • Taking drug therapy for lower-extremity pain.
  • Diagnosis of painful pathology in the anterior aspect of the knee secondary oncologic.

排除标准

  • The exclusion criteria are:
  • Traumatic history
  • Have had any type of analgesic treatment in the last 4 weeks (clinical, physical or orthostatic)
  • No need for drug treatment within the last 30 days of study initiation.

研究组 & 干预措施

Epte Bipolar System 2.0 - Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (NMP)

Active Comparator

EPTE Bipolar System is a medical device for health professionals that combines several techniques that extend the therapeutic variety of electrostimulation, for the treatment of different pathologies of the musculoskeletal system and peripheral and central nervous system. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (NMP)

干预措施: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation (NMP) (Device)

Epte Bipolar System 2.0 - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Active Comparator

EPTE Bipolar System is a medical device for health professionals that combines several techniques that extend the therapeutic variety of electrostimulation, for the treatment of different pathologies of the musculoskeletal system and peripheral and central nervous system. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

干预措施: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

OKS (Oxford Knee Score)

时间窗: 12 weeks

The Oxford Knee Score is a well-known tool for assessing quality of life in patients with Osteo Arthritis of the knee (OA). The OKS is a self-administered questionnaire that the patient can answer in face-to-face interviews or send by mail once completed. It contains 12 questions with 5 possible answers each aimed at evaluating the perception of the quality of life of the patient in the last four weeks. Each answer receives a score of 0 to 4, where 4 is the best possible result. After the sum, you get a total score ranging from 0 to 48, where 48 is the best possible result. The Spanish adaptation of the OKS questionnaire is a reliable tool to evaluate the perception of health-related quality of life of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KO)

RPE (Rating Perceived Exertion)

时间窗: 12 weeks

Borg created Borg's 15-point RPE scale. The modified RPE scale is 6 to 20 points. The level of physical exertion or perceived exertion is measured using the Borg 15-point RPE scale. A significant correlation was found between heart rate and Borg RPE of 15 points. In addition, this scale is thought to be a useful and economical tool for monitoring exercise intensity. Patients in clinical practice are instructed to choose a number from the scale and assess their total effort during endurance training. A score of six indicates lack of effort, or rest, and a score of twenty indicates maximum effort, or the most exhausting exercise

Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P)

时间窗: 12 weeks

The VISA-P questionnaire is used for assessing the severity of symptoms in individuals with patellar tendinopathy, the term pain refers to the specific area of the patellar tendon, to mark its intensity patients should mark taking into account that 0 represents absence of pain and 10 the maximum pain imagined by the patient. In the analysis of patellar tendon pathology has already been used in repeated articles

Threshold of pressure pain

时间窗: 12 weeks

The intensity of pain can provide relevant information, until now the measurement of pain was carried out subjectively for this reason there are efforts to develop devices to measure the intensity of painful stimuli objectively. Severity of pain also affects the patient's treatment strategy and goals because pain can cause incapacitation. Thus, several researchers have focused their efforts on creating pain-measuring devices called algometers. To measure this sensation, a pressure pain threshold (UDP)81 is usually used. It is applied at the above point and measured in N.

Lower Limb functional Index (LLFFI)

时间窗: 12 weeks

The questionnaire contains a number of phrases (25 in total) that patients use to describe problems on their legs. Evaluating only the last few days if a phrase describes you should check that box, you can also mark it partially and if not you should leave it blank. Finally, an LLFI score is obtained where the functional index of the lower extremities is determined. The LLFI consists of 25 items with three-point response options (Yes = 1 point), ("In part" or "half" 1/2 points) and (NO Points = 0). With a gross score range of 0 to 25 points. Takes approximately 2 minutes. The score is calculated by simply adding the answers together and multiplying them by four minus 100 to convert them into a percentage scale or maximum loss of function. The LLFI questionnaire in Spanish proved to be suitable for assessing the functionality of the lower limbs and viable for the evaluation of the condition and deterioration of the lower limbs in clinical and research settings

Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

时间窗: 12 weeks

Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Lower limb pain changes To mark its intensity patients should mark taking into account that 0 represents absence of pain and 10 the maximum pain imagined by the patient

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Universidad Europea de Canarias
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Eduardo Luis Martín Javier

Master of Science Professor Eduardo Martín

Universidad Europea de Canarias

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验