跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05512117
NCT05512117已完成不适用

Análisis de la utilización de Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos de Linea Media Frente a Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos Convencionales en el Servicio de Medicina Interna

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2017年2月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of punctures

研究概览

简要总结

The study aims to evaluate the rate of complications and the duration of cannulation of a midline intravenous catheter compared to a short peripheral catheter in patients hospitalized in an Internal Medicine service of a Spanish hospital.

详细描述

A randomized, longitudinal experimental study is designed, which will allow comparisons to be made between the results obtained in the experimental group and the control group.

The study will be carried out in the Internal Medicine and medium and long stay unit of the CHGUV, during the period of time necessary to complete the required sample size, which has finally been established at six months.

When the patient is admitted to our unit, a number is assigned from the admission service, based on their admission order; this number will serve for subsequent random assignment to one another group. In this case, the use of a website to generate said numbers is proposed.

Using established procedures for the generation of random numbers, the numbers that correspond to the subjects that are going to be part of each of the groups will be identified.

The list of random numbers that will make up the experimental group has been prepared previously by the Internal Medicine Unit secretary and will be known by the person who will carry out the placement of the midline catheter (two nurses from the unit trained in the placement and handling of this type of device, who will also be those in charge of training the rest of the staff).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Neither care providers nor patients could be masked because the intravenous device is different and it's easy to identify the one we are using.

Outcomes assessor only works with anonymized data

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The patients included were those who were hospitalized in the Internal Medicine Service of the Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia who needed intravenous therapy and who had signed the Informed Consent for placement of a midline at the time of the change of the PIVC placed in the emergency unit.

排除标准

  • Those with a forecast hospitalization of less than one week, those who were receiving palliative or symptomatic treatment, those who were carriers of a CVC or those who had presented difficulty in venous access with midline after two consecutive attempts were excluded

结局指标

主要结局

Number of punctures

时间窗: Four weeks

Number of times a catheter is inserted

Length of canalization

时间窗: Four weeks

Days of catheter stay

Phlebitis

时间窗: Four weeks

Presence of catheter related phlebitis

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Elena Chover Sierra

Principal Investigator

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Midline Catheters Versus Peripheral Catheters in... | 临床试验