Enhancing EP-Performed Alcohol Interventions in the ED
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 900
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- efficacy of brief intervention
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced emergency practitioner (EP) performed brief intervention (BI), namely, the Enhanced Brief Negotiation Interview (E-BNI). This includes a basic BNI performed in the ED with referral to a primary care provider, followed by a telephone booster intervention performed by trained nurses 1-month post ED visit. The E-BNI will be compared to the basic BNI (without booster), and standard care with assessments (SC-A) and without (SC-NA). In a randomized, controlled clinical trial 900 hazardous and harmful (HH) drinkers will be randomly assigned to one of the 4 conditions. We, the researchers at Yale University, will conduct cost benefit analysis of the interventions. Follow-up assessments, at 6 and 12-months, will be obtained via interactive voice response (IVR).
详细描述
A critical need exists to refine and test brief interventions (BI) for Emergency Department (ED) populations with hazardous and harmful (HH) drinking that can be translated into real-world settings; and to enhance the effects of these BIs so they can be maintained over time. The ED is an ideal setting for BIs, as many ED patients who exceed low-risk recommendations do not have contact with either alcohol treatment specialists or visit primary care medical practitioners. This includes a large segment of young adults ages 18-30 whose only contact with the health care system is often an ED visit. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced Emergency Practitioner (EP) performed BI, namely, the Enhanced Brief Negotiation Interview (E-BNI). This includes a basic BNI performed in the ED with referral to a primary care provider, followed by a telephone booster intervention performed by trained nurses 1-month post ED visit. The E-BNI will be compared to the basic BNI (without booster), and standard care with assessments (SC-A) and without (SC-NA). In a randomized, controlled clinical trial 900 HH drinkers will be randomly assigned to one of the 4 conditions. We will conduct cost benefit analysis of the interventions. Follow-up assessments, at 6 and 12-months, will be obtained via interactive voice response (IVR).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients, 18 years or older, who present to the adult ED at Yale-New Haven Hospital will be screened for exceeding the NIAAA criteria for low-risk drinking
- •Patients may be hazardous "at-risk" drinkers who screen over the limits, but do not currently exhibit medical, social or legal problems as a result of their drinking, or they may be harmful drinkers, presenting with an alcohol associated injury or illness.
排除标准
- •Patients will be excluded for the following reasons:
- •Non-English speaking;
- •Alcohol dependence;
- •Current enrollment in a substance abuse treatment program;
- •Current ED visit for acute psychiatric complaint;
- •Condition that precludes interview i.e., life threatening injury/illness;
- •In police custody; or
- •Inability to provide two contact numbers for follow-up.
研究组 & 干预措施
SCA
Standard Care with Assessment
SCNA
Standard Care No Assessment
BNI
Brief Negotiated Interview
干预措施: BNI (Behavioral)
EBNI
Enhanced Brief Negotiated Interview
干预措施: BNI (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
efficacy of brief intervention
时间窗: 12 months
次要结局
未报告次要终点
