跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02393989
NCT02393989已完成不适用

Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite

Ege University0 个研究点目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2010年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
50
主要终点
Modified Ryge Criteria

研究概览

简要总结

Background: This 3-year clinical trial compared the performance and post-operative sensitivity of a posterior resin composite with that of bonded-amalgam in large sized cavities. Additionally, it was evaluated whether resin composite could be an alternative for bonded amalgam.

Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients in need of at least two posterior restorations were recruited. Authors randomly assigned one half of the restorations to receive bonded-amalgam and the other half to composite restorations. Forty bonded-amalgams and composites were evaluated for their performance on modified Ryge criteria and post-operative sensitivity using VAS for 36-months.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • To be included, the teeth to be restored had to:
  • be asymptomatic
  • have occlusal and adjacent teeth in contact
  • have cavity sizes exceeding the one-third of the bucco-lingual distance between cusp tips -

排除标准

  • Patients with periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, bruxism or a history of allergic reactions to any of the materials

结局指标

主要结局

Modified Ryge Criteria

时间窗: 3 years

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Hande Kemaloglu

Dr

Ege University

相似试验