跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02637609
NCT02637609已完成不适用

Advancing Stated-preference Methods for Measuring the Preferences of Patients With Type II Diabetes

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,103 人开始时间: 2013年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,103
试验地点
1
主要终点
Priority Scores for Potential Barriers and Facilitators for Diabetes Self-management

研究概览

简要总结

In 2012, the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) issued guidance to clarify the principal benefit-risk factors FDA considers during the reviews for premarket approval applications and de novo classification requests. In addition to a detailed description of benefits and risks, CDRH listed "patient tolerance for risk and perspective on benefit" as a factor that CDRH may consider in regulatory reviews. It underlined the need for developing methods to measure patient preference and incorporate it into regulatory decision-making. The purpose of this study is to advance methods for patient and community engagement in patient-centered outcome research (PCOR) and has three objectives.

First, demonstrate good practices for patient and community involvement in PCOR projects by applying principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR).

Second, address methodological gaps pertaining to the use of stated-preference methods in studying priorities in PCOR. These include identifying the best methods for identifying patient priorities and strategies for analyzing variation in priorities. The investigators also seek to assess the relevance of stated-preference methods to patients and stakeholders using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Third, demonstrate good practices for applying stated-preference methods by studying the priorities of patients with type II diabetes. While type II diabetes provides an important case study, this research will advance approaches and methods that will be broadly generalizable to other diseases, and to diverse patient and stakeholder groups.

Clinical Significance:

This project will illustrate and advance methods for assessing the values of patients and stakeholders. It will demonstrate how CBPR methods apply to PCOR studies and the value of stated-preference methods in measuring the priorities of patients and stakeholders and directing health care.

详细描述

This study will apply the principles of CBPR to involve patients and stakeholders associated with a local community board and a national diabetes advisory board in key decisions in the project. During year 1, the investigators will utilize mixed methods to develop, pretest, and pilot the survey instruments to assess the priorities of patients with type II diabetes. In year 2, the investigators plan further engagement to finalize the survey instruments, and will implement a nationally representative, racially/ethnically diverse sample of patients with type II diabetes. Based on further consultation, the investigators will conduct statistical analysis, including stratified analyses and segmentation of patients with similar priorities. In year 3, mixed methods will be applied to assess beliefs of patients and other consumers about the relevance of this work and its generalizability to other PCOR topics. Finally, lay language reports will be developed to highlight patient and stakeholder engagement and the application of stated-preference methods to the study of the priorities of patients with type II diabetes.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participate in the GfK's KnowledgePanel
  • Self-reported Type II diabetes diagnosis

排除标准

  • Does not have Type II diabetes diagnosis
  • Unable to communicate in English or Spanish

结局指标

主要结局

Priority Scores for Potential Barriers and Facilitators for Diabetes Self-management

时间窗: One-time survey

Average Likert score or best-worst score that measures the impact of each factor on diabetes self-management. Positive scores indicate facilitators for diabetes self-management while negative scores indicate barriers. The magnitude of the score suggests the degree of the impact. Both scales are on a +1--1 scale. Positive 1 would be the largest possible facilitator and a negative 1 would be the largest possible barrier.

次要结局

  • Self-reported Difficulty in Understanding and Answering the Survey Questions(One-time survey)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Measuring the Priorities of Patients With Type II... | 临床试验