Expert Panel Statement for the Respiratory Management of COVID-19 Related Acute Respiratory Failure (C-ARF) Using Modified Delphi Methodology
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Consensus using participating experts opinions.
研究概览
简要总结
The investigators aim to achieve experts consensus on respiratory interventions in management of COVID-19 related acute respiratory failure (C-ARF).
详细描述
The investigators aim to achieve experts consensus on respiratory interventions in management of COVID-19 related acute respiratory failure (C-ARF). The pandemic of COVID-19 is unique in terms of a multitude of patients suffering from ARF and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation with single underlying inciting etiology.The experts have given divergent opinions on respiratory support of C-ARF which may have confused physicians globally.
The investigators are going to use a modified Delphi based methodology involving global participating experts. The objective is to achieve consensus statement on the management of C-ARF using "collective intelligence".
The whole process of this study will be done in the form of two-three rounds of Google Forms-based Delphi surveys. In this survey questionnaire, the investigators have prepared statements on the concern areas in the respiratory support of C-ARF. The survey has been divided into five sections related to C-ARF management. The majority of these statements are to be rated on Likert scale and others have multiple choices. There is an option for collecting participating experts comments in provided open space in round one which will be considered during round two questionnaire.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •(All the three criteria should be there) H index more than 10; one or more publication on respiratory failure in indexed journal; actively involved in management of COVID-19 related acute respiratory failure.
排除标准
- •Not meeting inclusion criteria
结局指标
主要结局
Consensus using participating experts opinions.
时间窗: 20 days
Survey Questionnaire containing seven point Likert scale and multiple choice questions.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Prashant Nasa
Head Critical Care Medicine
NMC Specialty Hospital
