跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04026555
NCT04026555已完成不适用

Realtime Streaming Clinical Use Engine for Medical Escalation

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 2,780 人开始时间: 2019年6月18日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
2,780
试验地点
1
主要终点
Overall Rate of Escalation

研究概览

简要总结

The escalation of care for patients in a hospitalized setting between nurse practitioner managed services, teaching services, step-down units, and intensive care units is critical for appropriate care for any patient. Often such "triggers" for escalation are initiated based on the nursing evaluation of the patient, followed by physician history and physical exam, then augmented based on laboratory values. These "triggers" can enhance the care of patients without increasing the workload of responder teams. One of the goals in hospital medicine is the earlier identification of patients that require an escalation of care. The study team developed a model through a retrospective analysis of the historical data from the Mount Sinai Data Warehouse (MSDW), which can provide machine learning based triggers for escalation of care (Approved by: IRB-18-00581). This model is called "Medical Early Warning Score ++" (MEWS ++). This IRB seeks to prospectively validate the developed model through a pragmatic clinical trial of using these alerts to trigger an evaluation for appropriateness of escalation of care on two general inpatients wards, one medical and one surgical. These alerts will not change the standard of care. They will simply suggest to the care team that the patient should be further evaluated without specifying a subsequent specific course of action. In other words, these alerts in themselves does not designate any change to the care provider's clinical standard of care. The study team estimates that this study would require the evaluation of ~ 18380 bed movements and approximately 30 months to complete, based on the rate of escalation of care and rate of bed movements in the selected units.

详细描述

Objectives:

Mount Sinai Hospital has developed a Rapid Response Team (RRT) system designed to give general floor care providers additional support for patients who may be requiring a higher level of care. This system enables both nurses and physicians to notify the RRT and have a critical care team evaluate the patients. During the period of 03/01/2018 to 09/17/2018, Mount Sinai Hospital floor units on 10W and 10E units made 357 rapid response team (RRT) calls with only 58 leading to an actual increase in the level of care (true positive rate ~ 16%). Similarly, the Electronic Health Record (EHR) generated 839 sepsis Best Practice Alerts (BPAs) yet only five led to escalations in care (true positive rate ~ 0.5%). The results above would imply that over 168 evaluations need to be made to identify a single case where the patient required an escalation in care. The goal of ReSCUE-ME is to evaluate prospective model performance and identify the best spot which the study team can incorporate MEWS++ into RRT and Primary providers workflow. The primary endpoint is rate of escalation of care on 10W and 10E during the study period.

Background:

In a prior study, the group has demonstrated that a machine learning model (MEWS++) significantly outperformed a standard, manually calculated MEWS score on a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients. To develop this model, the study team used a data set (Approved by the Program for Protection of Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB) IRB-18-00581) of 96,645 patients with 157,984 hospital encounters and 244,343 bed movements. The study team found that MEWS++ was superior to the standard MEWS model with a sensitivity of 81.6% vs. 44.6%, specificity of 75.5% vs. 64.5%, and area under the receiver operating curve of 0.85 vs. 0.71.

Encouraged by this prior result, the study team is seeking to evaluate the model in a prospective study.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

盲法说明

No masking is completed as the information/waiver of consent sheet for the two arms needed to be individualized.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients age 18 or greater who were admitted to a general care unit selected for each arm.

排除标准

  • Any admitted patient who has a "Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)" and/or a "Do Not Intubate (DNI)" order in the EHR,
  • any patient made "level of care" by RRT as documented in REDCap.

结局指标

主要结局

Overall Rate of Escalation

时间窗: 10 months

Rate of escalation of care from floor to Stepdown, Telemetry, ICU, per 1,000 patient bed days.

次要结局

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced a Cardiac Arrest Episode(10 months)
  • Number of Participants Requiring Blood Pressure Support(10 months)
  • Number of Participants Requiring Respiratory Support(10 months)
  • Mortality Rate(Duration of hospital stay, until discharge, regardless of stay length for patients who died in hospital, or 30 days after admission, starting from date of admission, up to 6 weeks.)
  • Notification Frequency - Number of Alerts Sent Per Day to Providers(10 months)
  • Number of Calls(10 months)
  • Sensitivity and Specificity of the RRT Alert(10 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Matthew Levin

Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验