跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06130397
NCT06130397已完成不适用

FRACT-AI: Evaluating the Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Image Analysis on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Frontline Clinicians in the Detection of Fractures on Plain X-Ray

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 21 人开始时间: 2024年2月8日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
21
试验地点
1
主要终点
Performance of AI algorithm: sensitivity

研究概览

简要总结

This study has been added as a sub study to the Simulation Training for Emergency Department Imaging 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05427838). This work aims to evaluate the impact of an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced algorithm called Boneview on the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians in the detection of fractures on plain XR (X-Ray). The study will create a dataset of 500 plain X-Rays involving standard images of all bones other than the skull and cervical spine, with 50% normal cases and 50% containing fractures. A reference 'ground truth' for each image to confirm the presence or absence of a fracture will be established by a senior radiologist panel. This dataset will then be inferenced by the Gleamer Boneview algorithm to identify fractures. Performance of the algorithm will be compared against the reference standard. The study will then undertake a Multiple-Reader Multiple-Case study in which clinicians interpret all images without AI and then subsequently with access to the output of the AI algorithm. 18 clinicians will be recruited as readers with 3 from each of six distinct clinical groups: Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Emergency Nurse Practitioners, Physiotherapy, Radiology and Radiographers, with three levels of seniority in each group. Changes in reporting accuracy (sensitivity, specificity), confidence, and speed of readers in two sessions will be compared. The results will be analyzed in a pooled analysis for all readers as well as for the following subgroups: Clinical role, Level of seniority, Pathological finding, Difficulty of image. The study will demonstrate the impact of an AI interpretation as compared with interpretation by clinicians, and as compared with clinicians using the AI as an adjunct to their interpretation. The study will represent a range of professional backgrounds and levels of experience among the clinical element. The study will use plain film x-rays that will represent a range of anatomical views and pathological presentations, however x-rays will present equal numbers of pathological and non-pathological x-rays, giving equal weight to assessment of specificity and sensitivity. Ethics approval has already been granted, and the study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at relevant conferences.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Emergency medicine doctors, trauma and orthopaedic surgeons, emergency nurse practitioners, physiotherapists, general radiologists and radiographers reviewing X-rays as part of their routine clinical practice.
  • Currently working in the National Health Service (NHS).

排除标准

  • Non-radiology physicians with previous formal postgraduate XR reporting training.
  • Non-radiology physicians with previous career in radiology

结局指标

主要结局

Performance of AI algorithm: sensitivity

时间窗: During 4 weeks of reading time

Evaluation of the Gleamer Boneview algorithm will be performed comparing it to the reference standard in order to determine sensitivity.

Performance of AI algorithm: specificity

时间窗: During 4 weeks of reading time

Evaluation of the Gleamer Boneview will be performed comparing it to the reference standard in order to determine specificity.

Performance of AI algorithm: Area under the ROC Curve (AU ROC)

时间窗: During 4 weeks of reading time

Evaluation of the Gleamer Boneview algorithm will be performed comparing it to the reference standard. Continuous probability score from the algorithm will be utilised for the ROC analyses, while binary classification results with a predefined operating cut-off will be used for evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Performance of readers with and without AI assistance: Sensitivity

时间窗: During 4 weeks of reading time

The study will include two sessions (with and without AI overlay), with all 18 readers reviewing all 500 XR cases each time separated by a washout period to mitigate recall bias. The cases will be randomised between the two reads and for every reader.

Performance of readers with and without AI assistance: Specificity

时间窗: During 4 weeks of reading time

The study will include two sessions (with and without AI overlay), with all 18 readers reviewing all 500 XR cases each time separated by a washout period to mitigate recall bias. The cases will be randomised between the two reads and for every reader.

Performance of readers with and without AI assistance: Area under the ROC Curve (AU ROC)

时间窗: During 4 weeks of reading time

The study will include two sessions (with and without AI overlay), with all 18 readers reviewing all 500 XR cases each time separated by a washout period to mitigate recall bias. The cases will be randomised between the two reads and for every reader.

Reader speed with vs without AI assistance.

时间窗: During 4 weeks of reading time

Mean time taken to review a XR, with vs without AI assistance.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Alex Novak

Primary Investigator

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验