A comparison of Ultrasonography guided Axillary nerve block Versus Combined Peripheral nerve stimulator and Ultrasonography guided Axillary nerve block in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Latency by Modified Lovett Muscle Power Scale and Numerical Rating Scale for pain
研究概览
简要总结
The effectiveness of electrical nerve stimulation of evoked motor responses has been called into doubt because ultrasonography is now frequently used to localise nerves during peripheral nerve blocking. Nerve stimulation’s function has evolved from that of a method for locating nerves to that of an addition to ultrasonography. When using ultrasound guided procedures, nerve stimulation may be effective as a safeguard against needle-nerve contact and as a means of avoiding nerves that are in the needle’s trajectory. When the position or appearance of the nerves may be varied, nerve stimulation is also a helpful adjunct in training amateurs in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.
Hence for surgeries involving elbow and forearm both USG and pns vs only USG guided Axillary nerve block is given.
And the efficacy of the block is assessed in the terms of time taken to perform the block, occurrence of LAST, Intraneural injections, onset of sensory and motor blockade in both procedures which is assessed by NRS SCALE and LOWETT muscle power scale.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 15.00 Year(s) 至 55.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA GRADE 1&2.
排除标准
- •No consent.
结局指标
主要结局
Latency by Modified Lovett Muscle Power Scale and Numerical Rating Scale for pain
时间窗: 0mins | 1min | 2mins | 3mins | 5mins | 7mins | 10mins
次要结局
- Need for supplementary analgesic agent by using Numerical Rating Scale for pain(0min)
