Evaluation of Rapid Diagnostic Solutions, Serological and Molecular Tests for COVID-19
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 1,210
- 主要终点
- Clinical performance of several diagnostic tests : tests based either on detection of the virus SARS-CoV-2 or detection of human antibodies generated in response to infection
研究概览
简要总结
Prospective study for clinical performance evaluation of COVID-19 diagnostic tests: detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by RDTs or ELISA (manual or automated), rapid diagnostic tests based on antigen detection, molecular or proteomic testing of SARS-CoV-2 (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values)
详细描述
Since initially reported in Wuhan, China, in late December 2019, the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has spread globally, stressing many health systems especially intensive care unit (ICU) capacities thus resulting in high mortality. On 16 March 2020, WHO Director-General called on all countries to ramp up their testing programs as the best way to slow the advance of the coronavirus pandemic. Although the current gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis remains real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), this technique has many shortcomings such as low sensitivity on nasopharyngeal swabs (70%). Multiple diagnostic test manufacturers have developed and begun selling rapid and easy-to-use devices. Before these tests can be recommended, they must be validated in the appropriate populations and settings.
Funded by French Defense Innovation Agency (AID), ERap-CoV is a prospective clinical study which aims to assess clinical performances of serological and antigenic assays for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, in comparison with current diagnostic tests on the market (immunological, proteomic, molecular). The ERap-CoV research will extend the clinical validation of the first NG-Test IgM-IgG COVID-19 point-of-care immunodiagnostic test (NG Biotech), which has shown excellent biological performance, compatible with the recommendations of the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) for serological assays (sensitivity> 90% and specificity> 98%, 15 days after symptoms) (1). Finally, AID funding will be used to develop 100% French-made serological and antigenic RDTs in less than a year.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •Common criteria for the 3 populations:
- •Person subject to a justice protection measure
- •Population 1 (Patients):
- •Refusal to participate by the patient / support person or close friend
- •Patient not speaking French and not accompanied by a translator
- •Patient under guardianship or curatorship
- •Person under AME (State medical aid)
- •Population 2 (Caregivers):
- •Refusal to participate
- •Population 3 (lay users):
- •Refusal to participate
- •Person not speaking French and not accompanied by a translator
- •Person under AME (State medical aid)
- •Person out of state to consent, under guardianship or curatorship
- •Pregnant and lactating women
结局指标
主要结局
Clinical performance of several diagnostic tests : tests based either on detection of the virus SARS-CoV-2 or detection of human antibodies generated in response to infection
时间窗: Total duration of the study is 10 months
* Tests based on detection of the virus SARS-CoV-2 (antigenic rapid tests, molecular tests, proteomic tests): sensibility and specificity compared to RT-PCR (Ct) in salivary samples and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients and cargivers included in the study * Tests based on detection of human antibodies generated in response to infection (rapid immunodiagnostic tests, ELISA): sensibility and specificity compared to RT-PCR (Ct) and ELISA (antibody titer) in blood or serum from patients and cargivers included in the study
次要结局
- Description of the incidence of infection among hospital caregivers, time to seroconversion according to clinical form, medium-term antibody persistence(Caregivers will be included in the study for 9 months. After inclusion (Day 0), follow-up visits at Day 15, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months will be done.)
- Sensitivity and specificity of antigenic rapid tests, molecular tests, proteomic tests according to the sample used (salivary samples or nasopharyngeal swabs) and according to the duration of the symptoms(Total duration of the study is 10 months)
- Sensitivity and specificity of immunological, antigenic, molecular and proteomic tests according to symptom duration, stage of the disease: asymptomatic, ambulatory, hospitalized, ventilated(Total duration of the study is 10 months)
- Sensitivity and specificity of immunodiagnostic tests according to the sample used (serum and capillary blood) and according to the duration of the symptoms(Total duration of the study is 10 months)
- Suitability of rapid tests in view of its intended purpose for self-testing(4 months)
