跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05855603
NCT05855603招募中不适用

Recurrent Cardioinhibitory Reflex Syncope. PermANent PAcemaker Therapy or CardionEuroablation? A Multicenter RAndomized Clinical Trial

Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge20 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2023年11月22日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
90
试验地点
20
主要终点
To determine the efficacy of CNA in the treatment of cardioinhibitory reflex syncope in comparison to pacemaker therapy.

研究概览

简要总结

Reflex syncope is the most common form of syncope. It can lead to injuries and affect quality of life. Nonpharmacological and medical therapies have limited effectiveness. In certain patients, cardiac pacing seem to be beneficial. More recently cardioneuroablation (CNA) has emerged as a novel therapy for reflex syncope. The investigators aim to determine whether CNA is more effective than cardiac pacing at reducing the rate of cardioinhibitory-type reflex syncope.

详细描述

Reflex or neurally mediated syncope is the most common form of syncope in any setting and at all ages. It is associated with an autonomic imbalance in which vagal hyperactivity predominates, resulting in vasodilation or bradycardia or both, thereby producing a fall in global cerebral perfusion. It is divided into three types: vasovagal, situational, and carotid sinus syndrome.

Reflex syncope is benign and usually occurs in healthy people; however, very frequent syncope or events without prodromal symptoms can lead to injuries and affect long-term quality of life. Nonpharmacological and medical therapies proven effective in randomized clinical trials are scarce. In certain patients with frequent and burdensome cardioinhibitory reflex syncope, dual-chamber cardiac pacemakers seem to be beneficial. More recently, catheter-based cardiac autonomic modulation, or cardioneuroablation (CNA), has emerged as a novel therapy for reflex syncope, and positive results in small open-label cohort studies, and more recently in the first randomized study, have been reported.

The literature provides sufficient evidence that cardiac pacing should be considered in select patients affected by severe forms of reflex syncope with frequent recurrence and a high risk of injury. Current guidelines suggest that pacemaker therapy should be considered in patients aged more than 40 years with frequent recurrent reflex syncope when asystole has been documented, induced by either carotid sinus massage (CSM) or the head-up tilt test (HUTT), or recorded using an electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring system (≥3 seconds if syncope, ≥6 seconds if asymptomatic).

Cardiac autonomic system modulation by endocardial ablation targeting atrial ganglionated plexi (GPs), or CNA, has been recently proposed as a novel therapy for reflex syncope.

Cardioneuroablation was introduced by Pachon et al. in 2005. In their initial study, twenty-one symptomatic patients with vasovagal syncope (6 patients), functional high-degree atrio-ventricular block (7 patients), and/or functional sinus node dysfunction (13 patients), were treated with CNA without complications. Follow-up for a mean of 9.2 months demonstrated symptom relief for all patients. After this initial description, several small studies and case series confirmed the efficacy of this approach. In a recent randomized prospective study, Piotrowski et al. documented that not only could CNA significantly reduce recurrences of syncopal episodes in patients with vasovagal syncope, it could also improve quality of life.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Aged more than 40 years.
  • Having a 12-month history that includes at least two documented episodes of spontaneous reflex syncope or one episode that led to injury in addition to at least two presyncopal events, refractory to all recommended types of standard treatment.
  • Bradycardia-syncope correlation (at least 3 seconds of asystole due to sinus arrest or atrio-ventricular block) confirmed by ECG during spontaneous syncope.
  • If lacking ECG evidence during spontaneous syncope, a cardioinhibitory response (VASIS type 2A or 2B) on tilt test.
  • Displaying indicators for pacing such as those suggested in the ESC guidelines for a class I recommendation for patients with reflex syncope.
  • Significantly decreased quality of life due to syncope.
  • Sinus rhythm on ECGs.
  • Obtained written informed consent.

排除标准

  • Intrinsic sinus or atrioventricular nodal disease with a proven indication for permanent pacemaker implantation.
  • Evidence of structural heart disease.
  • Contraindications to ablation in the right or left atrium.
  • Life expectancy <12 months.
  • Lacking willingness to comply with the randomization procedure.

结局指标

主要结局

To determine the efficacy of CNA in the treatment of cardioinhibitory reflex syncope in comparison to pacemaker therapy.

时间窗: 12 months

Differences in 12-month syncope-free survival between the 2 groups

次要结局

  • To evaluate the incidence of complications in the short and long terms for CNA compared to pacemaker therapy(1 and 12 months)
  • To determine if CNA produces variations in the QTc interval(12 months)
  • To determine which of the 2 strategies, CNA or cardiac pacing, is superior at preventing a composite of syncope and presyncope(12 months)
  • In patients undergoing CNA, evaluation of the degree of long-term reinnervation using the tilt table test (HUTT)(1 and 12 months)
  • In patients undergoing CNA, evaluation of the degree of long-term reinnervation using the atropine test(1 and 12 months)
  • Evaluations of changes in quality of life, comparing the two therapies(12 months)
  • To determine if CNA produces variations in the burden of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias compared to pacemaker therapy(12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Rodolfo San Antonio

Medical Doctor

Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge

研究点 (20)

Loading locations...

相似试验