跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01775371
NCT01775371已完成不适用

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Patient Controlled Analgesia in the ED

Albert Einstein College of Medicine6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 636 人开始时间: 2013年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
636
试验地点
6
主要终点
Rate of Change in Pain Intensity Per Hour

研究概览

简要总结

Background: Inadequate pain management is common in the Emergency Department (ED). Optimal treatment of pain necessitates titration to effective dose due to the large inter-individual variability in opioid requirement. However nurse administered titration is difficult to provide in this setting due to high patient to nurse and physician ratios and multiple urgent competing patient demands. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) lets ED patients actively participate in pain management by allowing self-titration to their desired level of pain relief. A tightly controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) recently completed by the investigators group provides promising preliminary support for the efficacy and safety of PCA for patients with abdominal pain at a single ED with a dedicated research nurse and standard loading dose given to all patients. Objective: The overall objective is to provide optimal pain management in the ED. Specific aims: 1)To compare the effectiveness and safety of PCA and non-PCA opioid analgesia when nurses involved in clinical care deliver the intervention to a broad group of ED patients with acute pain at multiple clinical centers. The primary hypothesis is that there will be a greater decline in pain over time and similar safety in patients randomized to receive PCA compared to patients receiving standard opioid analgesia. 2) To describe the feasibility of PCA in terms of patient and provider acceptance, resource utilization and cost associated with PCA. Innovation: PCA represents a novel shift from the current provider-driven model of ED pain management to one in which the patient is an active participant. Few prior studies have evaluated ED PCA and no systematic evaluation of time and resources exists. Methodology: An RCT will be performed at 3 clinical centers. 750 patients with acute pain warranting IV opioid administration will be randomized to receive usual opioid analgesia determined by the provider or PCA (loading dose 0.1 mg/kg morphine and demand dose of 1 mg morphine available every 6 minutes). Pain intensity will be measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) recorded every half hour up to 2 hours after initial opioid administration. Primary endpoints are rate of change in pain intensity from 30 minutes after initial administration of opioid to 2 hours as suggested by the results of the preliminary study and incidence of adverse events. PCA will also be compared to non-PCA opioid analgesia assessed at the end of the 2 hour study period by patient satisfaction with pain management; registered nurse (RN) assessment of time efficiency/ease of use and satisfaction with pain management; and physician satisfaction with pain management. Resource utilization and cost associated with implementation and use of PCA in the ED setting will be assessed by total Registered nurse (RN) time spent on pain management per patient; pharmacy preparation time per patient; material cost per patient and Registered Nurse and Physician training time necessary for PCA implementation. Significance: If PCA is demonstrated to be effective, safe, and associated with patient and provider acceptance and acceptable resource utilization, it has the potential to significantly improve ED pain management.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18 to 65
  • Patient deemed by the ED attending physician to require IV opioid analgesia for pain and for whom the ED Attending Physician would consider using PCA

排除标准

  • Patients requiring initial resuscitation that would preclude the use of PCA
  • Long-term use of prescription or non-prescription opioids now or within the past year
  • Recent opioid use within the past 24 hours
  • Chronic pain syndromes
  • Clinician suspicion of current or past opioid dependence/abuse
  • Altered mental status/Clinical suspicion of intoxication
  • Patients expected to require conscious sedation while in the ED
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of sleep apnea syndrome, baseline oxygen saturation (room air) < 97%
  • Systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg
  • Use of sedative medications e.g. benzodiazepines, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, phenothiazines, or tricyclic antidepressants.
  • History of renal insufficiency/renal failure
  • Prior allergic reaction to morphine
  • Inability to provide informed consent or inability to understand or operate PCA device
  • Previous entry of patient into study

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of Change in Pain Intensity Per Hour

时间窗: 1.5 hours

Rate of Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of Pain per hour where 0 indicates "no pain", 10 indicates "worst possible pain" between 30 minutes and 120 minutes post-baseline i.e. NRS at 30 minutes minus NRS at 120 minutes post-baseline.

次要结局

  • Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management(2 hours)
  • Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events(2 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验