跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04803942
NCT04803942Unknown不适用

Clinical Intuition for PRedicting Evolution in Sepsis in the Emergency Department - CIPRES-ED Study

Centre Hospitalier le Mans1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 692 人开始时间: 2021年1月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
692
试验地点
1
主要终点
Compare emergency physicians' clinical intuition versus qSOFA score for prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with suspected infection

研究概览

简要总结

Sepsis is a syndrome involving infection and an abnormal systemic inflammatory response in the infected organism, resulting in organ dysfunction and possibly death. It is a major cause of hospital mortality. A large proportion of sepsis diagnoses are made in emergency departments. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment have been shown to reduce mortality from this disease.

In a context of limited resources, it is therefore important to be able to quickly stratify patients presenting to the emergency department with a suspected infection into those who require rapid and intensive management because they are at risk of developing sepsis and septic shock and those who can be managed conventionally The objective of this study is to compare the clinical intuition of emergency room physicians and nurses with the qSOFA score to predict the clinical course of patients presenting to the emergency room with potential sepsis.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients presenting to one of the participating emergency departments with suspected infection, defined as the presence of at least one of these parameters:
  • Temperature ≥ 38°C ou < 36°C measured in the emergency room Chills (in the emergency room or on recent history)
  • No objection to participation in the study

排除标准

  • Minor patient (<18 years)
  • Patient under guardianship or other protective measure
  • Patient unable to understand research information
  • Patient refusing the use of their data for research purposes

结局指标

主要结局

Compare emergency physicians' clinical intuition versus qSOFA score for prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with suspected infection

时间窗: 1 month after inclusion

We compare the area under the ROC curve of each test (Emergency physicians' clinical intuition versus qSOFA score) to predict 30-day mortality in patients with suspected infection

次要结局

  • Compare emergency physicians' clinical intuition versus qSOFA score for prediction of 72 hours mortality in patients with suspected infection(72 hours after inclusion)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验