跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04430296
NCT04430296Unknown不适用

Low Power Continuous Wave Versus Micro Pulse Diode Versus High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Cyclophotocoagulation in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Cairo University0 个研究点目标入组 78 人开始时间: 2020年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
78
主要终点
Success rate.

研究概览

简要总结

The use of Cyclodestruction procedures has been extended to patients with non-refractory glaucoma and good vision. Our aim is to compare the safety and efficacy of three cyclodestructive treatments; High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Cyclocoagulation versus micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MP-CPC) versus transscleral continuous wave cyclophotocoagulation (CW-CPC) for the treatment of Primary open angle glaucoma.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • medically uncontrolled, primary open angle glaucoma attending glaucoma clinic

排除标准

  • patients with history of previous laser or surgical intervention

结局指标

主要结局

Success rate.

时间窗: 6 months

The success will be defined as IOP between 6 and 21 mmHg and at least a 30% reduction in IOP with or without topical IOP lowering medications.

次要结局

  • Frequency of complications(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

abdussalam abdullatif, MD

Lecturer

Cairo University

相似试验