Broken Endodontic Instrument Removal Using Ultrasounds, Microscope and a Modified Spinal Needle
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 161
- 主要终点
- Success rate of a non-surgical retreatment
研究概览
简要总结
The aims of this retrospective analysis are (1) to evaluate the success rate of a non-surgical retreatment of teeth with broken file instrument into the canal using ultrasounds, microscope and a modified spinal needle, (2) to assess the outcome of the treatment if the remaining fragment was left, bypassed or removed from the root canal in terms of survival rate of the treated teeth after a 5-years follow up period.
详细描述
The fracture of an endodontic instrument is a frustrating phenomenon, both for practitioners and patients, that can compromise the cleaning and shaping procedures of the root canal treatment, with a potential impact on the treatment outcome. In the past decades, the advent of rotary nickel titanium instruments resulted in an increased incidence of instrument separation.
Two mechanisms have been reported in order to describe the fracture of an endodontic instrument inside the root canal: torsional stress and cyclic fatigue. Cyclic failure is due to the constant tension and compression which insists on the file when it shapes the maximal root canal curvature area. Torsional failure occurs when the tip of the instrument locks on the wall of the root canal while the shafts keeps rotating, and the torque exceeds the plastic limit of the metal.
Several studies focused on causes and factors influencing the weakening of endodontic instrument after clinical use, and some recommendation were given trying to minimized the risk of instruments breakage. Nevertheless, this problem can still occur, even to an experienced operator, making the achievement of a correct and predictable root canal final treatment uncertain.
Due to their complexity, many of these cases are approached by extraction and implant replacement of the so evaluated "hopeless" tooth. Treatment decisions can vary widely among dentists and dental specialists and may be based more on personal values and experience than an objective analysis of treatment benefits, risks, costs, prognosis, and alternatives.
At present, there is no standardized procedure for safe and consistently successful instrument fragment removal in the dental literature.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All patients who received an endodontic retreatment due to a separated instrument inside a root canal were included in this study.
排除标准
- •Exclusion criteria were unavailability of complete clinical data or the use of other retreatment techniques.
结局指标
主要结局
Success rate of a non-surgical retreatment
时间窗: after 5-years follow-up
Number of non extracted teeth
次要结局
- Influence of the presence of periapical lesion on the outcome of the treatment(After 5-years follow-up)
- Influence of the presence of a root perforation on the outcome of the treatment(After 5-years follow-up)
- Influence of the corono-apical level of the fracture on the outcome of the treatment(After 5-years follow-up)
- Influence of the type of Root Canal on the outcome of the treatment(After 5-years follow-up)
- Influence of the presence of a root fracture on the outcome of the treatment(After 5-years follow-up)
- Influence of the type of Tooth on the outcome of the treatment(After 5-years follow-up)
研究者
Carlo Lajolo
Associate Professor and Principal Investigator
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
