Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Traditional Vaginal Hysterectomy to Harmonic Scalpel Hysterectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1 期
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Pain score
研究概览
简要总结
The hypotheses of this study is that the use of the instrument "Harmonic Scalpel" (ultrasonic shears) for vaginal hysterectomy instead of traditional sutures confers advantage over the use of traditional clamps and sutures. The proposed benefits and outcome measures are reduced blood loss, reduced operating time, reduced post-operative pain and earlier discharge from hospital. Other outcome measure will include complications and cost.
详细描述
Patients booked for vaginal hysterectomy at Southern Health will be offered participation in this trial, and randomised to two separate groups: procedure using ultrasonic shears or traditional sutures. Each patient will receive detailed explanation in document form as well as from the Gynaecology registrar in pre-admission clinic prior to obtaining consent.
After the procedure of vaginal hysterectomy, a research associate will follow these patients up until discharge, collecting relevant data.
A statistician has been employed to perform power calculations, and to analyse data after collection, looking at outcomes mentioned above.
The Harmonic Scalpel has been extensively used to replace the use of traditional clamping and suturing in General Surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, and specifically Total Laparoscopic Vaginal Hysterectomies, but it has never been subjected to a randomised control trial to confirm the anecdotal benefits of the device.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Any patient already on waitlist requiring vaginal hysterectomy
排除标准
- •No patient consent
结局指标
主要结局
Pain score
Time to discharge
Blood loss
次要结局
- Cost
- Complications
