Convenience and Cost-aspects of a New 1-step Reconstitution Injectable Artesunate Compared to Conventional 2-step Injectable Artesunate for the Treatment of Severe Falciparum Malaria: a Multi-centre Study

Study design:

Part 1

A comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times of 1-step parenteral artesunate to conventional artesunate in 2 countries. Patients with severe malaria will be enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment with conventional injectable artesunate or 1-step injectable artesunate. A physical examination will be performed daily and every six hours on indication. Vital signs rec-orded hourly for unstable patients, then 6 hourly for stabilised patients, and at each follow-up visit. A symptom questionnaire will be taken daily to help identify adverse events. Patients will be asked to come back for a follow-up visit at day 7, 14, 21 and 28. Patients will not be followed up longer. In case of unresolved important sequelae at day 28, the patient will be followed and treated longer in order to provide the appropriate clinical care.

A Time and Motion study will record the time to prepare the artesunate solution for injection and administer treatment, number of actions performed to prepare treatment, and consumables used. Clinical, parasitological, and laboratory assessments will be recorded while patients are admitted in hospital and then weekly up to day 28 to assess recovery and determine final status.

Part 2