Community - Based Asthma Intervention in Subsidized Preschools
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 2,000
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 6 month post-intervention: quality of CCC asthma policy
研究概览
简要总结
From a previous community needs survey, we determined that asthma was a particular problem in our community-based research network of child care centers. This study will examine whether a moderate intervention can help these centers improve their "asthma-friendly" rating as per NHLBI guidelines. We will both center directors and parents to establish baseline data on child health and the "asthma-friendliness" of each center. We will use a wait-list control, with all centers eventually receiving the intervention.
详细描述
Asthma is the most common chronic health problem affecting children in the U.S., and it is getting worse. Children under the age of 18 years account for one third of the nation's asthma sufferers. The percent of children with asthma has increased from 3% in 1981 to 6% in 2003. Asthma is a leading reason for hospitalizations of children under the age of 15 years and causes 14 million days of missed school each year. Previous studies suggest particularly high asthma rates among Hispanic and African-American populations. Poverty, increased exposure to indoor allergens, low education level, poor access to healthcare, and failure to take prescribed medicines increase the likelihood of having a severe asthma attack, or dying of asthma.
According to the results of HealthSpark I, children in the target communities have rates of asthma that are more than three times the national average. 29.3% of HealthSpark families with children ages 3 to 5 years responded "yes" to the question, "Did a doctor ever tell you that your child has asthma?" In a national survey in 2002, only 7.3% of parents with children ages 0 to 4 years responded "yes" to the same question. The high rate of asthma among HealthSpark families is similar to recent reports of high prevalence in Harlem, NY, and other underserved, minority communities.
Of HealthSpark parents reporting that their child has asthma, 38.7% also reported that their child was taking a medication regularly for more than a year. It is reasonable to assume that most of these were asthma medications, which suggests that approximately 11.3% of the total HealthSpark population has moderate to severe asthma. These children also had high rates of comorbidity. HealthSpark children with asthma were twice as likely as children without asthma to be limited in their daily activities, and three times as likely to require increased medical, educational, and mental health services. HealthSpark children with asthma were also two to three times as likely than children without asthma to have early signs of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Our analysis also revealed ethnic differences in asthma prevalence consistent with national patterns. African American children were nearly twice as likely to have a diagnosis of asthma when compared with Hispanic children (40.6% vs. 23%). None of these findings were related to access to child health care. Children with asthma, in fact, had better access to care than children without asthma, as demonstrated by the following measures: having a regular source of care (99.4% vs 91%), having health insurance (92.5% vs. 88.6%), and having a regular doctor that their parents could name (94.0% vs. 86.5%). Children with moderate/severe asthma had even better access to care: 98.4% of parents could name their physician and 97% had health insurance for their child.
In 1989, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) was initiated by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (part of the NIH) to address the growing problem of asthma in the United States. To accomplish these broad program goals, the NAEPP works with intermediaries including major medical associations, voluntary health organizations, and community programs to educate patients, health professionals, and the public. The ultimate goal of the NAEPP is to enhance the quality of life for patients with asthma and decrease asthma-related morbidity and mortality. As part of this broad program, the NHLBI released guidelines for CCCs to provide optimal care for children with asthma. These "asthma-friendly" guidelines are at the core of this proposal.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1 Year 至 5 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Children ages 1 - 5 years, enrolled in one of the designated SPARK child care centers
排除标准
- •Children under the age of 1 year
- •Children whose parents do not want to participate
- •Children whose child care centers do not want to participate
研究组 & 干预措施
Intervention - asthma education
CCC received asthma education in the first 6 months of the study
干预措施: Asthma education (Behavioral)
Wait-list control
CCC received asthma education in second 6 months of study
干预措施: Asthma education (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
6 month post-intervention: quality of CCC asthma policy
时间窗: 6 months
Did CCC have appropriate policy
次要结局
- 6 month post-intervention changes in asthma outcomes(6 months)
研究者
Jeffrey P. Brosco
Professor, Clinical Pediatrics
University of Miami
