跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07625397
NCT07625397已完成不适用

Imran's Approach: A Quasi-Experimental Prospective Comparative Study of an Alternative Positioning Technique for Spinal Anesthesia and Lumbar Puncture

Wah Medical college , POF hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2026年3月2日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

This quasi-experimental prospective clinical trial was conducted to compare the conventional sitting position with the Imran Technique, a novel ergonomic patient-positioning method, for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture. A total of 200 adult participants requiring spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture were allocated into two groups. The study aimed to evaluate procedural success, procedural efficiency, patient comfort, operator ergonomics, and procedure-related complications associated with the two positioning techniques.

详细描述

This quasi-experimental prospective clinical trial was designed to compare the conventional sitting position and the Imran Technique during spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture procedures. Adult participants aged 18 to 65 years who required spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture were enrolled and allocated into two groups.

Participants in the control group underwent the procedure using the conventional sitting position, while participants in the intervention group underwent the procedure using the Imran Technique. The primary outcome measure was first-attempt procedural success. Secondary outcome measures included total procedural time, positioning-to-needle insertion time, number of needle attempts, needle redirections, intervertebral space changes, overall procedural success, need for operator assistance, patient comfort, ability to maintain position, operator strain, accessibility of the intervertebral space, and procedure-related complications.

The study was conducted at the Intensive Care Unit of the Department of Anaesthesiology, POF Hospital, Wah Cantt, Pakistan, following Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent procedures.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult participants aged 18 to 65 years
  • Participants requiring spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture
  • Participants medically suitable for spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture
  • Participants able to assume and maintain the assigned procedural position
  • Participants who provided written informed consent

排除标准

  • Age below 18 years or above 65 years
  • Previous spinal surgery
  • Significant spinal deformity
  • Local infection at the puncture site
  • Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
  • Raised intracranial pressure
  • Severe hemodynamic instability
  • Inability to maintain the assigned procedural position
  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent

研究者

发起方
Wah Medical college , POF hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验