跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06579534
NCT06579534尚未招募不适用

Exploring the Effectiveness of Multimedia Health Education Guidance on Risk Perception, Self-Health Management, and Fall Prevention Among Frail Patients

Asia University0 个研究点目标入组 102 人开始时间: 2024年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
102
主要终点
inpatients' knowledge of fall risk in acute medical institutions

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the impact of precision health care interventions on inpatients in acute medical institutions regarding their risk of falls, management, and prevention knowledge, as well as the incidence of falls among these patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:

What is the effectiveness of precision health care interventions on inpatients' knowledge of fall risk in acute medical institutions? What is the effectiveness of precision health care interventions on inpatients' knowledge of fall management in acute medical institutions? What is the effectiveness of precision health care interventions on inpatients' knowledge of fall prevention in acute medical institutions?

详细描述

Frailty relates to the concept of physical deterioration associated with the aging process, which includes a weakening of the physiological and integrated physical strength of the body, its reserve and resistance to stressors, resulting in poor health, such as loss of physical and mental performance. Frailty is an important health care topic in patients with geriatric syndromes. Once the elderly enter the early stage of frailty, they are likely to fall repeatedly. Studies have shown that frailty and premature aging are important predictors of falls in the elderly. Therefore, professional medical staff should use frailty assessment indicators as early as possible to assess the possibility of frailty among the elderly in medical institutions or communities. At the same time, effective prevention strategies should be adopted to prevent reduce the incidence of falls due to frailty and improve the quality of life of patients and the elderly. Therefore, assessment of possible falls and frailty risks is a priority in acute care settings.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Fall prevention education before discharge is an inevitable measure. Participants accepted such measures but did not know that this study involved differentiated health education methods.

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients admitted to general acute wards and surgical patients
  • Fall assessment score ≥ 3% of the high-risk group for falls

排除标准

  • Patients who were bedridden for a long time before admission
  • Patients suffering from mental illness
  • The patient or primary caregiver cannot respond effectively

结局指标

主要结局

inpatients' knowledge of fall risk in acute medical institutions

时间窗: discharge day (assessed up to 1 days)

Fall Risk Assessment Scale: Knowledge related to fall risk is a self-compiled questionnaire with a total of 5 questions. The estimated test time is 3 to 5 minutes. Answer with true or false questions, each question is worth 20 points, and the score ranges from 0 to 100 points. The higher the score, the better the knowledge level.

inpatients' knowledge of fall management in acute medical institutions

时间窗: discharge day (assessed up to 1 days)

Fall Prevention Self-health Management Scale: The knowledge related to fall prevention and self-health management is a self-constructed questionnaire with a total of 5 questions. The estimated test time is 3 to 5 minutes. Answer with true or false questions, each question is worth 20 points, and the score ranges from 0 to 100 points. The higher the score, the better the knowledge level.

inpatients' knowledge of fall prevention in acute medical institutions

时间窗: discharge day (assessed up to 1 days)

Fall Prevention Scale Knowledge related to fall prevention is a self-constructed questionnaire with a total of 5 questions. Answer with true or false questions, each question is worth 20 points, and the score ranges from 0 to 100 points. The higher the score, the better the knowledge level.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验