Exploring Integrative Medicine for Back and Neck Pain - A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Days with pain
研究概览
简要总结
Research over the last years have reported an increased popularity of complementary therapies (CTs) and an integration of CTs into mainstream medical settings, health care organizations and insurance plans. These trends may present both new challenges and new opportunities for health care provision. In Sweden and elsewhere, major challenges include the great variety and quality of CT provision within health care and a lack of national and international recommendations of how integrations of CTs with conventional care should be modelled, i.e. lack of conceptual models for delivering integrative medicine (IM). This may partly be a result of a scarce evidence base in support of IM provision within public health care services, e.g. lack of IM compared to usual care in randomised clinical trials. It remains largely unknown whether comprehensive models of IM are clinically or cost effectively different from conventional care provision.
Back and neck pain are costly, conventionally managed in primary care and two of the most common conditions treated by CTs. We have developed a comprehensive collaborative consensus model for IM adapted to Swedish primary care. The aim of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of the IM model versus conventional primary care in the management of patients with non-specific back/neck pain.
详细描述
Study objectives included the exploration of recruitment and retention rates, patient and care characteristics, clinical differences and effect sizes between groups, selected outcome measures and power calculations to inform the basis of a full-scale trial.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Back/neck pain with or without headache for at least two weeks and at least three times per week
- •Resident of Stockholm County
- •Literate in Swedish
- •Willing and able to comply with study requirements
排除标准
- •Specific pathology and severe causes of back/neck pain such as malignant disease, vertebral fractures and severe or progressive neurological symptoms.
结局指标
主要结局
Days with pain
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Number of days with pain over the last two weeks (0-14 days)
Physical functioning
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Role physical
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Bodily pain
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Stress
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Numerical rating scale 0-10 (higher score worse)
Use of non-prescription analgesics
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Use of non-prescription analgesics during the last two weeks (yes/no)
General health
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Vitality
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Social functioning
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Role emotional
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Mental health
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
SF-36 domain 0-100 (higher score better)
Disability
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Numerical rating scale 0-10 (higher score worse)
Well-being
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Numerical rating scale 0-10 (higher score better)
Use of prescription analgesics
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Use of prescription analgesics during the last two weeks (yes/no)
Use of conventional care
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Use of conventional care during the last two weeks (yes/no)
Use of complementary care
时间窗: Change from baseline to follow-up after 16 weeks
Use of complementary care during the last two weeks (yes/no)
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Torkel Falkenberg
Researcher
Karolinska Institutet
