跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06829732
NCT06829732招募中不适用

Closed Loop Oxygen Control in INtubated Critically Ill Patients - CLOC-IN

Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 46 人开始时间: 2023年4月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
46
试验地点
2
主要终点
Efficacy outcome:

研究概览

简要总结

The deleterious effects of alveolar hyperoxia and (severe) hyperoxaemia are well described. Achieving safe and efficient oxygenation may be challenging. The hypothesis of the present study is that closed-loop oxygen control in intubated and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients improves oxygen administration compared with standard manual oxygen titrations. A single-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the use of a closed-loop oxygen control versus manual oxygen titration in patients receiving mechanical ventilation has been designed. Patients will be randomised to receive first either closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) or manual oxygen titration (MOT). The percentage of time spent in optimal and sub-optimal SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) ranges will be calculated for each period.

详细描述

The deleterious effects of alveolar hyperoxia and (severe) hyperoxaemia are well described. A safe and efficient oxygenation should be achieved. However, from a practical point of view, this may require frequent manual adjustments of the inspired oxygen, which might be unfeasible, especially in high-demand periods. Several automatic oxygen systems have been tested in non-intubated patients. The hypothesis of the present study is that closed-loop oxygen control in intubated and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients improves oxygen administration compared with standard manual oxygen titrations. Thus, the objective of the study is to compare the percentage of time spent in a predefined optimal SpO2 range between closed-loop oxygen control and manual oxygen titration.

A single-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the use of a closed-loop oxygen control versus manual oxygen titration in patients receiving mechanical ventilation has been designed. Once included, patients will be randomised to receive first either closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) or manual oxygen titration (MOT). Every period will last for 4h. Clinical and respiratory variables will be recorded. A memory box will be connected to the patient's ventilator. This device will record ventilator parameters, including FiO2 and SpO2. To assess the outcome, the percentage of time spent in optimal and sub-optimal SpO2 ranges will be calculated for each period.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients admitted to the ICU who are expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 8 hours and are expected to stay respiratory stable´ in the upcoming 8 hours.
  • Acute respiratory failure with PaO2/FiO2 <300 with FiO2 ≥ 0.4 at inclusion
  • Age older than 18 years old.
  • Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient or one relative in case that the patient is unable to consent, after full explanation of the study by the investigator and prior to study participation.

排除标准

  • Low quality on the SpO2 measurement using finger and ear sensor (quality index <60%).
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as a need of continuous infusion of epinephrine or norepinephrine > 1 mg/h.
  • Severe acidosis (pH ≤ 7.30).
  • Chronic or acute dyshemoglobinemia: methemoglobin, CO poisoning, sickle cell disease.
  • Patient under guardianship or deprived of liberties.
  • Impossibility to give informed consent by both patient and family (i.e. language barrier).
  • Patient included in another interventional research study under consent with similar outcome.

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy outcome:

时间窗: Hour 1 to 4

To compare the percentage of time spent in a predefined optimal SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) range between closed-loop oxygen control and manual oxygen titration

次要结局

  • Percentage of time with SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) in sub-optimal ranges(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Percentage of time with SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) out of range(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Number of manual adjustments(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Mean SpO2/FiO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio) between the two methods(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Mean FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) between the two methods of oxygen titration(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Time with FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) below 40%(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Time with FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) above 60%(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Time with FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) at 100%(Hour 1 to 4)
  • SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) below 88 and 85%.(Hour 1 to 4)
  • SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) below 88 and 85% (Event > 10s and 60 s)(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Number of alarms(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Time with SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) signal available.(Hour 1 to 4)
  • Total amount of oxygen used(Hour 1 to 4)

研究者

发起方
Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Oriol Roca

Director of Critical Care Department

Parc Tauli Research and Innovation Institute Foundation

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验