跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01543282
NCT01543282已完成不适用

Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasonography Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Using Free Stylet 22g and 25 g Needles in Solid Lesions

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2011年12月10日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
120
试验地点
2
主要终点
Accuracy of stylet-free, solid lesion EUS-FNA using the 22 G FNA vs the 25 G FNA needle, in consecutive patients referred to EUS-FNA.

研究概览

简要总结

This is a randomized controlled study comparing EUS-FNA with 22 gauge and 25 gauge needles in consecutive patients.

Summary

Background: three needle sizes for endoscopic ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are currently available: 22 Gauge (G), 25 G and 19 G. However, well design studies comparing them regarding efficacy and feasibility are lacking.

Aims: to investigate diagnostic yield, specimen adequacy, feasibility and complications of the conventional 22 G compared with the 25 G needle.

Methods: patients ≥ 18 years, referred to EUS-FNA for a solid lesion will be considered for inclusion. Patients with suspected diagnosis of lymphoma, GIST, sarcoidosis, significant coagulopathy (APT < 50% or platelets < 50000/mm3), use of warfarin or other anticoagulants, use of clopidogrel within 7 days of EUS, inability or refusal to sign the informed consent and pregnancy or suspected pregnancy will be excluded.

Participants will be randomized to 22 G needle and 25 G FNA. Chi-square test will be used to compare proportions. Continuous variables will be compared using Student´s t test. A two-tailed P values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The diagnostic yield of 25 G and 22 G needle will be evaluated by four criteria: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. An expected rate of 85% diagnostic yield from EUS guided FNA by using 22G needle will be considered. By using a power of 80% and an α value of 0.05 would be necessary 120 patients per group to detect a 15% difference in the rate of diagnostic yield.

详细描述

  1. Objectives

PRIMARY To compare diagnostic yield of stylet-free, solid lesion EUS-FNA using the 22 G FNA vs the 25 G FNA needle, in consecutive patients referred to EUS-FNA.

SECONDARY

To investigate:

  1. specimen adequacy,
  2. number of FNA passes,
  3. ease of puncture,
  4. failure of the FNA needle and
  5. complications

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA of a solid lesion.

排除标准

  • Age < 18 years
  • Patients with suspected diagnosis of lymphoma, GIST, sarcoidosis or other lesions in which a large amount of tissue will be required for diagnosis
  • Significant coagulopathy (INR > 1.5, platelets < 50000/mm3
  • Use of low molecular weight heparin, use of clopidogrel within 7 days of EUS)
  • Cystic lesions
  • Inability or refusal to sign the informed consent

结局指标

主要结局

Accuracy of stylet-free, solid lesion EUS-FNA using the 22 G FNA vs the 25 G FNA needle, in consecutive patients referred to EUS-FNA.

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

  • Specimen adequacy, number of FNA passes, ease of puncture, failure of the FNA needle and complications(6 months)

研究者

发起方
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验