A Multicentre Randomised Study Comparing Indwelling Pleural Catheter With Talc Pleurodesis in Patients With a Malignant Pleural Effusion
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 160
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Number of hospital days for all causes following intervention
研究概览
简要总结
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) accounts for 50% of all pleural effusions and affects about 300,000 patients annually (UK and USA). Lung and breast cancers account for majority of malignant pleural effusions; 1 in 3 breast cancer, 1 in 4 lung cancer as well as > 90% of patients with mesothelioma develop pleural effusions. Breathlessness from MPE is disabling and impairs quality of life. Median survival ranges between 4-6 months. Although thoracentesis provides effective symptom relief, most effusions recur and pleurodesis is the standard of care. Pleurodesis can be performed via chest tube or applied during pleuroscopy, and talc is the most effective agent. For successful pleurodesis to occur the underlying lung must expand after fluid drainage and trapped lung due to metastatic disease occurs up to 30%. Symptomatic patients require hospitalization for these procedures which are likely to fail if trapped lungs are encountered, and pose significant burden to health services. Tunneled indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is emerging as a viable alternative which provides access to the pleural space for fluid drainage when breathlessness arise. IPC can be performed at ambulatory setting without hospital admission. Case series have demonstrated long-term safety of IPC even in patients undergoing chemotherapy with acceptable complication rates. By keeping the pleural cavity free of fluid, IPC has led to spontaneous pleurodesis in 50% of patients, which allows its removal. Presently IPC is indicated for trapped lung or when talc pleurodesis has failed. A randomised comparative trial with talc pleurodesis is necessary to determine role of IPC as first-line therapy of MPE, if IPC leads to reduction in hospitalizations, adverse events and healthcare costs, and if it improves quality of life. The multicenter trial randomizes symptomatic patients 1:1 to IPC or talc pleurodesis, and endpoints include hospitalization days till death or end of study, adverse events, quality of life, and healthcare costs.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Symptomatic malignant pleural effusion requiring intervention
排除标准
- •<18 years of age
- •pregnant or lactating patients
- •expected survival <3 months
- •chylothorax
- •previous attempted pleurodesis
- •pleural infection
- •leukocytopaenia (<1.0 x 10^9/L)
- •uncorrectable bleeding diathesis
- •inability to give informed consent or comply with the protocol
结局指标
主要结局
Number of hospital days for all causes following intervention
时间窗: Up to 1 year
次要结局
- Number of adverse events(Up to 1 year)
- Breathlessness score(Up to 1 year)
- Self-reported quality of life scores(Up to 1 year)
- Number of hospital days computed for pleural effusion related cause(Up to 1 year)
- Health costs computation(Up to 1 year)
研究者
Medicine
A/Prof Lee Pyng
National University Hospital, Singapore
