跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05484518
NCT05484518已完成不适用

Is Method of Levels (MOL) an Acceptable and Feasible Psychological Intervention for People Using Community Based Crisis Services? A Case Series.

University of Manchester2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 6 人开始时间: 2022年9月6日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
6
试验地点
2
主要终点
Recruitment rate.

研究概览

简要总结

A mental health crisis is when someone is so distressed they need urgent help from services; often because they behave in ways that poses risk to themselves or others. Crisis teams offer care in the community to support people at home rather than in hospital. Current psychological interventions offered by crisis teams tend to be short-term and mainly involve providing information about the difficulties people are experiencing and help them to develop skills, such people as problem solving. This can be useful, however providing more intensive psychological support has been much more difficult within crisis settings, as teams must use limited resources to focus on managing risk. A therapy, called Method of Levels (MOL), designed to be flexible, may be helpful to add to treatment offered by crisis services in the community.

MOL aims to help people hold their attention on a problem long enough to view it in different ways, so that they might think of new solutions. This works by helping a person to regain a sense of control in their life and feel less distressed. MOL is useful for working with lots of different issues, since therapy does not only focus on one type of problem. People also get to choose what is discussed in therapy and session structure.

Research has shown MOL can be useful for people in crisis in places such as inpatient settings. So far, no research has been conducted within the community for people in crisis. This study aims to examine if MOL can be delivered within a crisis service in a way that is helpful and acceptable to people. To do this, the investigators will offer MOL to a small number of people presenting to crisis teams and collect information on whether people take up the therapy, and their experience of receiving it.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

盲法说明

One group only, no masking required.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults, aged over 18 years.
  • Meet criteria for crisis services and currently working with the crisis team
  • Able to provide informed consent (no queries regarding capacity)
  • Willing to engage in psychological therapy.
  • Ability to speak English fluently enough to provide informed consent and engage in therapy.

排除标准

  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Inability to speak English fluently enough to engage in therapy: As MOL is a therapy that relies on mobilising attention, the use of interpreters during therapy for non-English speakers may serve to alter the participants attention differently. This may confound results; as this is a preliminary case series, it would not be appropriate to include non-English speakers.
  • Problems of an organic nature, or a learning disability that might affect cognitive functioning.
  • Substance misuse as primary presenting problem.

结局指标

主要结局

Recruitment rate.

时间窗: Length of study (up to one year)

Number of participants recruited into the study.

Qualitative interviews

时间窗: End of therapy, up to 5 months.

Thematic analysis of qualitative interviews following end of therapy.

Psychological Outcome Profiles.

时间窗: Beginning of each therapy session for length of therapy (chosen by participant), up to 5 months

Quantitative measure to indicate acceptability. Total score between 0-20, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.

Session Rating Scale.

时间窗: End of each therapy session (chosen by participant), up to 5 months.

Quantitative measure to indicate acceptability.Total score between 0-40, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.

Retention rate.

时间窗: Length of study (up to one year)

Number of participants retained to the end of the study.

次要结局

  • Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure(On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up)
  • BBC Subjective Well-being scale (BBC-SWB) (Kinderman, Schwannauer, Pontin, & Tai, 2011).(On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up)
  • Suicidal ideation Attributes Scale.(On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up)
  • Reorganisation of Conflict Scale.(On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sara Goodier

Student/Chief Investigator

University of Manchester

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验