跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05528965
NCT05528965招募中不适用

Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2022年9月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS)

研究概览

简要总结

Although there are different ways of performing genicular nerve radiofrequency on knee pain, to our knowledge, there is no stuies comparing the clinical outcomes of a parallel technique vs. a perpendicular technique. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these both techniques.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • Intra-articular injections in the knee during the 3 months prior to procedure
  • Chronic pain syndrome
  • Lumbar radicular pain
  • Patients who are unwilling or mentally incapable to complete the study questionnaires.

结局指标

主要结局

The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS)

时间窗: 6 months after intervention.

The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10).The lower the score, the least pain the patient experiences.

次要结局

  • The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)(6 months after intervention.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Halil Cihan Kose

Principal investigator

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for... | 临床试验