Cost/Utility Ratio in the Management of Patients With Acquired Severe Brain Injury: Comparison Between a Programme of In-hospital Graded Intensity Rehabilitation and Usual Care.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 249
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- cost/utility ratio
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study was to compare the cost/utility ratio of a management model of integrated, graded, intensive rehabilitation (GIR) versus usual care (UC) for patients with acquired Severe Brain Injury (SBI).
详细描述
Materials and methods Study design This study was an organizational assessment of an integrated system of care (GIR) for patients with SBI and was designed as a prospective, randomised trial. An individual record was created for each patient with SBI; this record contained the patient's personal data, information prior to admission to intensive care or neurosurgery, clinical characteristics, the presence of devices, complications, time of hospitalisation in an Intensive Care Unit, and cognitive conditions. Once it had been determined that the study entry criteria were met, the patients were entered in the register and prospectively in parallel-group randomised to two different management strategies.
The concealment of allocation was guaranteed by the availability of beds in the ward. Patients and health care providers and assessors were blinded to the study designed to compare the strategies management. Data analysts were blinded to treatment.
Sample size The sample size requirements for this study are intended to provide adequate power for the analysis of the primary objective ( decrease event-related mortality). The simulation were run in statsoft six sigma software according to the following hypotheses: the mortality of severe brain injury used as a Null hypothesis was 58%. This percent value is expected to decrease at 40% in the study arm. The target type-I error(α) was 0.05. A sample size of 119 patients per group would allow a power of 80% to detect an individual risk score ratio of 0.70 with a type -I error of 0.05.
Based on the availability of beds in the ward, two groups were formed:
(i) the UC patients who, while meeting the criteria for access into the Graded Intensity of Rehabilitation Unit for patients with SBI (SBI-GIRU), did not enter the department because no beds were free and were, therefore, discharged from the Intensive Care Unit into the management models available, such as acute care, Intensive Brain Injury rehabilitation ( cod 75) brain injury rehabilitation (code 56) ( hospital admission, lasting on average 60 days, in which intensive rehabilitation care is delivered prior to transfer to another structure), long-term care, home.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with acquired Severe brain injury
- •patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score <8
- •patients with Focal ischaemic lesion, cerebral contusion or hemorrhage on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
排除标准
- •patient with age< 18 years
- •patients with previous degenerative nervous disease
- •oncological patients with reduce life expectancy
- •patients with impaired vital signs
结局指标
主要结局
cost/utility ratio
时间窗: up to 1 year
Management outcomes. The management outcomes considered were: access time, number of structures involved in the management of the patient, the healthcare path, the number of days spent in hospital, the type of management to which the patient was subsequently addressed. Functional results. These included the number of devices at discharge, the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score, the Barthel Index score and any change in quality of life, assessed using the classification system based on the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 Survival. The patient's death related to the event index was considered as a hard event. In the survival analysis the two management models were considered as predictors of mortality. The association between independent predictors and outcome was assessed by comparing the follow-up data with a Cox proportional hazards regression model. The end-point of the study was event-related mortality
次要结局
- quality of live(up to 1 year)
研究者
Soccorso Capomolla, MD
Director severe brain injury rehabilitation Unit
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
