跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03532373
NCT03532373已完成不适用

Testing of a Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for CTS

Stanford University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 49 人开始时间: 2021年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
49
试验地点
1
主要终点
Decisional Conflict Scale

研究概览

简要总结

This study will complete a randomized controlled trial to quantitatively measure patient decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) in 150 patients treated for CTS with the tool compared to 150 patients treated with standard care. The investigators hypothesize patients treated for CTS will have lower decisional conflict with the tool.

详细描述

The investigators will measure decisional conflict in 150 new patients being evaluated for CTS with the tool compared to 150 patients being evaluated for CTS with standard care. Those patients randomized to receiving the tool will use it to identify their preferences for certain attributes of care. Patients will then be presented with their preference data and the surgeon will have a discussion with the patient regarding CTS. Surgeons will have their standard discussion with the patients randomized to the standard care group (no tool). The tool will be operationalized on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant data platform, such as Qualtrics, and no identifiable data will be collected. De-identified data will be shared from study cites with our team at Stanford. This data will be backed up on a computer encrypted by Stanford.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

盲法说明

No masking will occur

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •New patient
  • •English fluency and literacy
  • •Able to take informed consent
  • •clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

排除标准

  • •Prior diagnostic testing for carpal tunnel (nerve test, ultrasound)
  • •Prior carpal tunnel release
  • •Diagnosis of C5/6 radiculopathy (double crush)
  • •Peripheral neuropathy (ex: diabetic)
  • •Worker Compensation/EMG Required
  • •Symptoms of Cubital tunnel syndrome

研究组 & 干预措施

Control

No Intervention

None- normal care

Intervention

Experimental

Patients will use a preference elicitation tool to determine their preferences for diagnosis and treatment of CTS

干预措施: Preference Elicitation tool (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Decisional Conflict Scale

时间窗: Immediately after using tool (up to 5 minutes to complete survey)

The Decisional Conflict Scale measures uncertainty in choosing options; modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making; and effective decision making such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. The survey consists of 16 statements with 5 response categories. Scoring: total scale-0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extreme decisional conflict). Lower values indicate lower decisional conflict- i.e. a better outcome for use of the tool. Calculation: Summed, divided by # of items, multiplied by 25

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Robin Kamal

Assistant Professor

Stanford University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验