跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02980601
NCT02980601终止不适用

The Use of Integra in Coverage of Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site Defect

Wake Forest University Health Sciences2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 10 人开始时间: 2015年11月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
10
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of Participants With Skin Graft Necrosis.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this research study is to compare the forearm free flap of patients with a traditional split thickness skin graft and those repaired with Integra (a skin substitute that helps to provide wound closure) and a split thickness skin graft. The study team will be looking at the subject's satisfaction with how the skin graft site looks and how well the skin graft site is functioning.

详细描述

The radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap (hereafter referred to as RFFF) was described more than 30 years ago as a fasciocutaneous flap for microsurgical transfer. It was soon after established as a safe and reliable flap for transfer of fascia and cutaneous tissue. Currently, it is used to repair any defect in which a relatively thin island of skin is needed with a fascial strength layer . While the flap itself is very reliable, it leaves a donor site that can be very unsightly and has multiple known complications including loss of pronation, pain, paresthesias, cold intolerance, and skin graft necrosis. The donor site is typically covered with a split thickness skin graft (hereafter referred to as STSG). In an effort to minimize these complications, several groups have described a technique of placing Integra© dermal substitute (hereafter referred to as Integra) underneath the STSG to provide a thicker support and decrease overall morbidity associated with the defect. These studies have shown success in decreasing overall morbidity including increasing range of motion and improving aesthetic quality of the donor site. However, the largest study to date has included only 29 subjects. Furthermore, these studies do not provide a comparative cohort of subjects repaired with a classic STSG to show effectiveness of this technique when compared to a classic repair. Our goal is to perform a prospective study comparing subjects repaired with a classic STSG and those repaired with one step Integra and STSG applied at the same time. These subjects will be evaluated for overall donor site aesthetic quality and functional outcome as described below.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All subjects who receive a radial forearm free flaps in the included time period, including subjects with head and neck cancer, traumatic defects, chronic wounds, or any other problems that require a radical forearm free flap for reconstruction.
  • Have had a distal, anterograde fasciocutaneous flap
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an IRB-approved informed consent document.
  • Smokers and tobacco users will be included in this study

排除标准

  • Subjects who have had an osteocutaneous or musculocutaneous flap.
  • Subjects who have a radial forearm flap with a proximal skin flap or subjects that receive a "reverse" radial forearm flap
  • Pregnant women will be excluded due to the lack of clinical studies evaluating INTEGRA template in pregnant women.

研究组 & 干预措施

Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)

Experimental

A sheet of Integra directly on the wound bed with subsequent removal of the overlying silicone sheet and immediate application of a 0.008mm STSG.

干预措施: Integra plus STSG (Device)

Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)

Experimental

A sheet of Integra directly on the wound bed with subsequent removal of the overlying silicone sheet and immediate application of a 0.008mm STSG.

干预措施: STSG (Procedure)

Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)

Active Comparator

reconstruction as dictated by the protocol. They will either receive 1) a 0

干预措施: STSG (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Participants With Skin Graft Necrosis.

时间窗: 1 year

Number of participants with skin graft necrosis.

Vancouver Scar Scale - Pigmentation

时间窗: 1 year

Pigmentation will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-2; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Vancouver Scar Scale - Height

时间窗: 1 year

Height will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-3; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch

时间窗: 1 year

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Hand Strength - Grip

时间窗: 1 year

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Hand Strength- Pincer

时间窗: 1 year

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers

Wrist Range of Motion- Extension

时间窗: 1 year

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Patient Scar Assessment- Paresthesia

时间窗: 1 year

Presence of paresthesia on a 1-10 scale , higher score denote worse outcomes

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)

时间窗: 1 year

Functional outcome as measured by pre and post operative assessment on the QuickDASH scale. On a scale of 0-100; with higher score denotes worse outcome measure

Skin Pliability

时间窗: 1 year

Skin pliability will be measuredusing a Cutometer MPA 580. We plan to measure Pliability (Ua), Elasticity (Ue), Retraction (Ur). Viscoelasticity (Uv), and Extension (Uf).

Vancouver Scar Scale

时间窗: 1 Year

The Vancouver Scar Scale will measure donor site aesethetic quality and it encompasses 4 separate outcomes to be objectively assessed. Each has been separately reported in the literature for each group in different papers as previously mentioned. We will compare the final score as well as scores within each outcome.On a scale of 1-13; with higher score denoting worse outcome.

Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion

时间窗: 1 year

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Number of Participant With Tendon Exposure

时间窗: 6 month

Tendon exposure identified clinically.

Percent of Wound Contracture

时间窗: 1 year

Planimetry Software will be used to measure and determine percentage of wound contracture

Vancouver Scar Scale - Vascularity

时间窗: 1 year

Vascularity will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-3; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Vancouver Scar Scale - Pliability

时间窗: 1 year

Pliability will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 1-5; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Rate of Tendon Exposure

时间窗: 1 year

Tendon exposure identified clinically.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验