跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04011839
NCT04011839已完成不适用

Evaluation of Perineural Catheterization Practices in Postoperative Orthopedic Surgery

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 7 人开始时间: 2021年6月7日最近更新:
适应症
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
7
试验地点
1
主要终点
Comparison between sensory Block Quality and motor Block deep

研究概览

简要总结

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks are considered as the gold standard for postoperative analgesia in orthopaedic surgery (shoulder, knee, foot). These techniques are also used in chronic pain.

The main disadvantage of these techniques is that they can drive a more or less deep motor block that slows down the rehabilitation process. This disadvantage could be prevented (or minimized) by adapting the protocol for administering local anesthetics or by changing molecules (levobupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml instead of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml). There is no literature comparing the effectiveness of the sensory block and its impact on the motor block according to the administration protocol and/or the type of local anesthetics.

The main judgement criterion of such a study could be a composite criterion crossing the quality of the sensory block and the depth of the motor blockades, the ideal being to have a perfect sensory block without any motor block.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • >18 years old
  • ASA score 1 to 4
  • Scheduled orthopaedic surgery
  • consent to participate

排除标准

  • Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding woman
  • Emergency situation
  • Contraindications to local anaesthesia
  • Patient refusal

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison between sensory Block Quality and motor Block deep

时间窗: Day1 to Day 3

Composite score between 0 to 2 for Sensory Block and 0 to 2 for motor Block

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验