The Effect of Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Rehabilitation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 38
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
研究概览
简要总结
The study aimed to determine the effect of mirror therapy versus conventional physical therapy treatment in improving upper extremity impairments and motor function among chronic hemiplegic subjects.
Research Objectives:
- To discover the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy treatment on improving upper limb motor function among chronic hemiplegic subjects.
- To find out the effect of mirror therapy along with conventional physical therapy treatment on improving upper limb motor function among chronic hemiplegic subjects.
- To find out the effectiveness of mirror therapy combined with conventional physical therapy treatment versus conventional physical therapy treatment alone on improving upper extremity motor function among chronic hemiplegic subjects.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 45 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Duration of stroke more than six months
- •Subjects of chronic stroke with left or right hemiplegia.
- •Genders of male and female with age ranging between forty-five to sixty-five years.
- •MMSE scores greater than 23 out of
- •Scored one or one plus on MAS on all muscles of the affected upper limb.
- •Have normal visual perception.
- •Able to follow oral commands.
排除标准
- •Unable to follow visual and oral commands.
- •Unilateral neglect.
- •Cognitive impairments (MMSE scores less than 24 out of 30), or language deficits.
- •Any other neurological disorders and recent surgeries.
- •Previous exposure to MT.
结局指标
主要结局
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
时间窗: week 0 and week 6
The most widely applied method in post-stroke rehabilitation to estimate gross motor impairment is the FMA. It pursues the concept of stages of recovery for stroke patients, which developed with Twitchell and Brunnstrom. It gauges the capacity to manage isolated joints, which are impeded by synergy, and the strength of muscle, with an assumed order of difficulty. The components of the assessment are five including: joint range of motion (ROM), balance, sensory function, motion of the joint, and joint discomfort. FMA-UE is split into whole, proximal, and distal components and these subtests investigate the movement of body parts independently, with the authors recommending that every part of UE heal alone. It is used in the clinical field and in research to detect disease progress, prescribe exercise recovery, and prepare and evaluate medicine. FMA has as well demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability, also the feasibility of construction.
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
时间窗: week 0 and week 6
This examination tool was designed to estimate and evaluate the exercise capacity of individuals who suffer from mild to acute upper extremity motion impairments in laboratory and clinical settings. It is an improvement of a previous examination tool utilized in high-functioning patients, but difficult to perform in patients with minimal capacity of movement in the hands and fingers. WMFT has proven its significance in describing motion status in terms of severity and upper extremity motion impairments in a cohort of chronic individuals who suffer from stroke and traumatic brain injury in high-functioning individuals. The inter-test and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency of tests, and stability for schedule measures of performance and functional ability were high, varying from 0.88 to 0.98, with most estimates' relative from 0.95
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Karthick Balasubramanian
Lecturer
University of Jazan