Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Tear of the Anterior Superior Labrum of the Hip
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 180
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Comparison of conventional ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint and arthroscopic diagnosis results
研究概览
简要总结
The patients were divided into two groups, one group was a suspected hip joint anterior superior labrum tear, and the other group was a non-hip joint disease. The patients received conventional ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and high-resolution single hip MRI for surgery Perform diagnostic power test for the gold standard.
详细描述
The patients were divided into two groups, one group was patients with suspected anterior superior labrum tear, and the other group was patients with non-hip joint diseases. Routine ultrasound diagnosis of the hip, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and high-resolution single hip MRI were performed. For patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery after diagnostic occlusive treatment, the results of arthroscopic exploration are used as the diagnostic gold standard. A tear detected during the operation was judged to be positive, and a tear not detected was judged to be negative. For patients who have not undergone hip arthroscopic surgery after the closure treatment, if the MRI of the hip is performed, the MRI result is the gold standard. The diagnosis of tearing was judged as positive, and the undiagnosed tearing was judged as negative. This study was used to compare (1) the diagnostic efficacy of hip joint contrast-enhanced ultrasound and high-resolution single hip MRI in patients with suspected anterior superior labrum tear. (2) Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced hip joint ultrasound and conventional ultrasound in patients with suspected anterior superior labrum tear. (3) In the process of judging the hip joint anterior superior labrum tear by conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the hip joint, the consistency of repeated readings and the comparison of the consistency between readers.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Only
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 14 Years 至 —（Child, Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Case group inclusion criteria (1) Age is greater than or equal to 18 years old (2) Patients with preoperative ultrasound examination for clinically planned hip joint anterior superior labrum tear (3) The patient can understand and sign the informed consent form .
- •Control group inclusion criteria
- •Age is greater than or equal to 18 years old
- •Patients who come to the ultrasound department of our hospital for treatment of non-hip joints at the same time
- •The patient can understand and sign the informed consent form
排除标准
- •Case group exclusion criteria
- •Mental conditions are not allowed
- •Adhesives that are allergic to any known . Control group exclusion criteria (1) Mental conditions are not allowed (2) Adhesives that are allergic to any known (3) Past and current diseases of other hip joint diseases
结局指标
主要结局
Comparison of conventional ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint and arthroscopic diagnosis results
时间窗: Hip arthroscopy was performed 1 week after ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint.
Comparison of conventional ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint and arthroscopic diagnosis results
Comparison of conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint and arthroscopic diagnosis results
时间窗: Hip arthroscopy was performed 1 week after conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint.
Comparison of conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis of the hip joint and arthroscopic diagnosis results
Comparison of high-resolution single MRI diagnosis of the hip joint and arthroscopic diagnosis results
时间窗: Hip arthroscopy was performed 1 week after high-resolution single MRI diagnosis of the hip joint.
Comparison of high-resolution single MRI diagnosis of the hip joint and arthroscopic diagnosis results
次要结局
未报告次要终点