跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06314620
NCT06314620已完成不适用

Safety And Efficacy Of 8 Hourly Normal Saline Flushing With And Without Heparin Lock In Maintaining Small Bore Intercostal Chest Catheter (ICC) Patency ; A Prospective Pilot Study

National University of Malaysia2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2024年3月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
2
主要终点
To compare the rate (in percentage) of occlusions of intercostal chest catheter in participants underwent normal saline flushing with and without heparin lock

研究概览

简要总结

Pleural diseases are among the most common clinical problems encountered in healthcare settings in Malaysia and even worldwide. Most patients presented in a hospital setting with pleural diseases will need pleural aspirations or thoracentesis and chest drains for a variety of reasons. Healthcare providers will often be exposed to patients requiring pleural drainage hence it is important to be aware of safe techniques and procedures of insertion and also maintaining the pleural drainage systems to yield beneficial results.

Most often, smaller catheters were deemed to be less effective in view of slower drainage rates and associated with high risk of blockage. However presently , in tertiary hospital settings small bore intercostal chest catheters (SBICC) have become an alternative to large bore intercostal catheters (LBICC). SBICC has been found to be equally effective, less painful and easily tolerated by patients. Hence, proper maintenance of SBICC should be undertaken to reduce rates of occlusion and to yield most benefits from the pleural aspirations procedures.

British Thoracic Society in their latest guidelines recommends the use of small bore intercostal chest drain as the first choice in draining pleural effusions.

The success of draining pleural effusions with a SBICC has shown variable rates of success among different studies conducted. Most common issues faced are drain blockage and drain dislodgement.

There is limited data comparing the use of normal saline flushing versus fibrinolytic drug lock in maintaining patency of small bore intercostal chest drains in draining pleural effusions. This has lead us in conducting this research to compare the rates of partial or complete occlusions among normal saline flush with and without heparin saline lock in maintaining the patency of small bore intercostal chest catheter among patients with pleural diseases in Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, UKM requiring chest drains insertion.

详细描述

Hypothesis

  1. Rate of occlusion is less in group with Heparin Saline lock.
  2. Rate of occlusions is higher in patients with exudative effusions. e.g : Empyema, raised pleural fluid LDH, low pleural pH, positive pleural cultures.
  3. Onset of ICC occlusions is lower in group with Heparin Saline lock.
  4. There is no difference in blood parameters between 2 groups.
  5. There are no apparent adverse effects between 2 groups.
  6. Patients in group with Heparin Saline lock have lower numbers of fenestration occluded.

Significance of Research Pleural diseases are among the most common diseases encountered in tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. Healthcare providers will need to provide adequate drainage of pleural fluids to improve the treatment outcome of patients. One of the mainstays of treatment is to ensure adequate drainage by reducing the rate of blockage of chest drains. This study is a pilot study to determine the efficacy as well as to ascertain the safety profile of using normal saline vs heparin saline lock for small bore intercostal catheters among pleural disease patients.

Type of Study Study on the Safety and Efficacy of 8 Hourly Flushing of ICC with and without Heparin Saline Lock in Maintaining Patency of ICC (SENSHIP Trial) is a prospective open label randomized controlled trial , a pilot study of patients admitted with pleural diseases in need of small bore intercostal catheters in Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, HUKM.

Standard Of Care Current Standard of Care in managing ICC in pleural diseases follows the recommendation of British Thoracic Society Guidelines where it suggests for regular flushing of ICC. The guideline recommends flushing of the tube by instilling 20-30ml of Normal Saline flush every 6 to 8 hours by a three way stopcock. However, this guideline only recommends regular flushing with Normal Saline and no research has been conducted to compare the outcome of effusions drainage and rates of blockage in small bore chest tubes with different techniques of flushing. Despite regular flushing with Normal Saline solutions as recommended, the rate of blockages in ICC still remains high. Hence, by adapting the concept of Heparin Saline Lock in IJC to maintain the patency of the tubing, we would like to study the difference of regular 8 hourly Normal Saline flushing with and without Heparin Saline Lock in maintaining ICC. Participants in this study who are chosen into Heparin Saline Lock arm will be receiving approximately 2ml of Heparin Saline as locking solution in attempt to maintain the ICC tube.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All patients admitted in medical wards for pleural effusion who had small bore intercostal catheters inserted.

排除标准

  • Patients with hydropneumothorax with small bore intercostal catheters
  • Patients with septated effusion planned for intrapleural fibrinolysis
  • Patients with severe coagulopathy
  • INR ≥ 1.5
  • PT > 37s
  • aPTT > 100s
  • Patients with thrombocytopenia of less than 50 x 109/L
  • Patients who has not consented to be involved in the study
  • Patients with indwelling pleural catheters
  • Unconscious patients will be excluded from this study
  • Patients with poor GCS score will be excluded from this study

研究组 & 干预措施

Participants who underwent ICC with normal saline flushing and heparin lock

Active Comparator

Participants who underwent intercostal chest catheter with normal saline flushing with heparin lock. Instillation done with 20 mls of Normal Saline flush followed by heparin saline lock, every 6 hours by a three way stopcock.

干预措施: Heparin saline lock (Drug)

Participants who underwent ICC with normal saline flushing without heparin lock

Active Comparator

Participants who underwent intercostal chest catheter with normal saline flushing without heparin lock. Instillation done with 20 mls of Normal Saline flush , every 6 hours by a three way stopcock.

干预措施: Without heparin saline lock (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the rate (in percentage) of occlusions of intercostal chest catheter in participants underwent normal saline flushing with and without heparin lock

时间窗: From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain

Participants who underwent intercostal chest catheter insertion who received normal saline flushing with and without heparin lock.

次要结局

  • To determine the change of hemoglobin (in g/dL) post ICC insertion(From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain)
  • To determine the onset of intercostal chest catheter occlusions (in hours)(From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain)
  • To assess the number of fenestrations occluded (in numbers from 0-5) with fibrin or blood clots(From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain)
  • To determine the change of platelet (in 10 9/L) post ICC insertion(From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain)
  • To determine the adverse effects of heparin saline lock(From the time of randomization to the time of the end of study up to 30 days post insertion of chest drain)

研究者

发起方
National University of Malaysia
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验