Impact of Decision Quality by Using Question Prompt List on the Shared Decision Making in End-stage Renal Disease Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 154
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Decisional self-efficiency
研究概览
简要总结
To investigate the effects of a question prompt list (QPL) on a shared decision-making consultation among facing decision for dialysis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the university medical center of North Taiwan. Subjects were randomized assigned to QPL group or usual care group. Decisional quality and decision control preferences were assessed with questionnaires. Measurements were performed at before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling (T1), and evaluate decision regret at one month after treatment.
详细描述
The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of decisional quality and decisional control preferences by using a specific question prompt list (QPL) during a shared decision-making consultation among facing decision for dialysis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the university medical center of North Taiwan. Recruit subjects are those who are about to receive the nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making (SDM) for patients with ESRD and attend the program. By using blocked Randomization design, the investigators assigned participants to QPL group or usual care. Prior to a clinic visit to discuss treatment, two-pages ESRD QPL leaflets are provided to QPL group, while usual care group without receiving provision of QPL. Measurements of outcome included decision quality (decision conflict, decisional self-efficiency) and decision control preference at before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling (T1), and evaluate decision regret at one month after treatment (T2), at this time the patient has decided and started to accept the selected treatment (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or conservative treatment). All statistical analyses were performed in SAS statistical software, version 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC). The effects of the intervention were assessed by generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis with the coefficient of interaction ( group × time) term. Statistical tests were two-sided with a significance level of 0.05. Hierarchical Linear Model was used to detect the impact of nested within physician.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease who facing decision for dialysis;
- •normal cognitive functions;
- •be able to read, communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese;
- •ability to express willingness;
排除标准
- •vision or hearing function impairment;
- •Severe illness;
- •Urgent to dialysis for extend life;
- •Dialysis modalities Already decided.
结局指标
主要结局
Decisional self-efficiency
时间窗: before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
Decision self-efficiency was measured by Decisional Self-Efficiency Scale(DSES). The scale represents self-confidence or belief in decision making. The scale consists of 11 items that are rated on a 5-point likert-scale from "not at all confident" (0) to" very confident "(4) . The sum of scores are calculated from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the higher the level of self-confidence.
Decision conflict
时间窗: before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
Decision conflict was measured by Decision conflict scale(DCS). The scale consists of 16 items into 5 subscales: Uncertainty(3 items), Informed(3 items), values clarity(3 items), support(3 items), and effective decision(4 items) that are rated on a 5-point likert-scale from "strongly agree" (0) to "strongly disagree" (4). The sum of scores are calculated from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the higher the level of decision conflict.
次要结局
- Decision control preference(before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1))