Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-eluting Stent Angioplasty for Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusion

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents one of the most complex and technically demanding lesion subsets in the management of coronary artery disease. CTO lesions are characterized by complete coronary artery occlusion with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 0 flow for a duration of at least three months and are frequently associated with increased procedural complexity, longer intervention times, and higher rates of restenosis and repeat revascularization.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is currently considered the standard interventional treatment for CTO lesions and has demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of vessel patency and symptom relief. Nevertheless, DES implantation is associated with potential limitations, including permanent metallic implantation, risk of late stent failure, in-stent restenosis, and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. As a result, alternative strategies that avoid permanent implants have gained increasing interest.

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has emerged as a promising alternative approach in selected coronary lesions by delivering antiproliferative drugs to the vessel wall without leaving behind a permanent scaffold. The use of DCBs may offer theoretical advantages in CTO interventions, including preservation of native vessel anatomy, reduced risk of late adverse events, and potential facilitation of future interventions if needed. However, evidence directly comparing DCB angioplasty with DES implantation in the setting of CTO remains limited.

The present study is designed to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of DCB angioplasty versus DES implantation in adult patients undergoing PCI for chronic total occlusion. Eligible patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CTO who meet predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled. The choice of revascularization strategy will follow the study protocol, and procedural success will be assessed according to standardized angiographic and clinical definitions.

Clinical outcomes, including procedural success, major adverse cardiovascular events, need for repeat revascularization, and other relevant follow-up parameters, will be evaluated during the follow-up period. Angiographic outcomes, such as vessel patency and restenosis, will also be assessed when applicable. By comparing these two treatment strategies, this study aims to provide further evidence to inform optimal interventional management of CTO lesions and to clarify the potential role of drug-coated balloon angioplasty as an alternative to drug-eluting stent implantation in this challenging patient population.